Krista K. Proia
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Nicolaas P. PronkDavid P. HopkinsAnilkrishna B. ThotaGibril J. NjieErin K. Sauber‐SchatzJames W. StephensJohn D. OmuraEva Leidman
- Topics
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers)Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceArgentina
In The Last Decade
Krista K. Proia
16 papers receiving 748 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 232
- General Health Professions 190
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 143
- Economics and Econometrics 139
- Epidemiology 119
Countries citing papers authored by Krista K. Proia
This map shows the geographic impact of Krista K. Proia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Krista K. Proia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Krista K. Proia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Krista K. Proia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Krista K. Proia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Krista K. Proia. The network helps show where Krista K. Proia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Krista K. Proia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Krista K. Proia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Krista K. Proia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Krista K. Proia. Krista K. Proia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 145 | |
| 5 | 85 | |
| 6 | 95 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 170 |
About Krista K. Proia
Krista K. Proia is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice and Health Information Management, having authored 17 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (47 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (67 citations) and Health Information Management (55 citations). Krista K. Proia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Nicolaas P. Pronk, David P. Hopkins, Anilkrishna B. Thota, Gibril J. Njie, Erin K. Sauber‐Schatz, James W. Stephens, John D. Omura, Eva Leidman, Lindsey M. Duca and Thomas E. Kottke. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes Care, American Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.