Koen Peers
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Filip StaesKarel StappaertsOron LevinLuc JanssensBenoit GebaraBert AertgeertsDirk RamaekersS Ilsbroukx
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Orthopedics and Sports MedicinePhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationPathology and Forensic Medicine
- Partner nations
- BelgiumItalyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Koen Peers
18 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 154
- Surgery 73
- Biomedical Engineering 72
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 68
- Pharmacology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Koen Peers
This map shows the geographic impact of Koen Peers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koen Peers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koen Peers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Koen Peers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koen Peers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koen Peers. The network helps show where Koen Peers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Koen Peers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Koen Peers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Koen Peers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Koen Peers. Koen Peers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 53 | |
| 20 | Treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears by latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. | 22 |
About Koen Peers
Koen Peers is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (154 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (18 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (68 citations). Koen Peers has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Filip Staes, Karel Stappaerts, Oron Levin, Luc Janssens, Benoit Gebara, Bert Aertgeerts, Dirk Ramaekers, S Ilsbroukx, Paul Van Asch and Peter Feys. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Sports Medicine, BMJ Open and European Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.