Klaus‐Peter Guenther
- Surgery top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Frank KrummenauerWolf-Christoph WitzlebR TomczakManfred NelitzJoerg ZieglerPablo R. RosH.–J. BrambsPatricia J. Mergo
- Topics
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (6 papers)Hip disorders and treatments (6 papers)Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (5 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of RoentgenologyThe Journal of ArthroplastyJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandSweden
In The Last Decade
Klaus‐Peter Guenther
11 papers receiving 697 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Surgery 631
- Biomedical Engineering 146
- Rheumatology 93
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 66
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 60
Countries citing papers authored by Klaus‐Peter Guenther
This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus‐Peter Guenther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus‐Peter Guenther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus‐Peter Guenther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus‐Peter Guenther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus‐Peter Guenther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus‐Peter Guenther. The network helps show where Klaus‐Peter Guenther may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klaus‐Peter Guenther
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klaus‐Peter Guenther. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klaus‐Peter Guenther based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Klaus‐Peter Guenther. Klaus‐Peter Guenther is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 86 | |
| 3 | IN-VIVO WEAR RATE OF BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY | 1 |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 61 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 96 | |
| 8 | 130 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 165 | |
| 11 | 58 |
About Klaus‐Peter Guenther
Klaus‐Peter Guenther is a scholar working on Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Urology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 723 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (6 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (6 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (631 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (66 citations) and Rheumatology (93 citations). Klaus‐Peter Guenther has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Frank Krummenauer, Wolf-Christoph Witzleb, R Tomczak, Manfred Nelitz, Joerg Ziegler, Pablo R. Ros, H.–J. Brambs, Patricia J. Mergo, Stefan Keßler and Uwe Hanisch. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Roentgenology, The Journal of Arthroplasty and Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.