Kimberly Titus
- Ecology top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Byron K. WilliamsJames A. MosherMark R. FullerMerav Ben‐DavidStephen B. LewisGrey W. PendletonMary M. PeacockJames E. Hines
- Topics
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers)Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kimberly Titus
23 papers receiving 879 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Ecology 853
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 345
- Global and Planetary Change 215
- Ecological Modeling 188
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 143
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Titus
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Titus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Titus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Titus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Titus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Titus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Titus. The network helps show where Kimberly Titus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly Titus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly Titus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly Titus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly Titus. Kimberly Titus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | A video surveillance system for monitoring raptor nests in a temperate rainforest environment | 19 |
| 8 | 173 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | Detecting trends in hawk migration count data | 9 |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | Considerations for monitoring raptor population trends based on counts of migrants | 11 |
| 16 | 133 | |
| 17 | Sprig Delivery by Broad-winged Hawks | 0 |
| 18 | Developing a practical model to predict nesting habitat of woodland hawks | 22 |
| 19 | 74 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Kimberly Titus
Kimberly Titus is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (188 citations), Ecology (853 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (345 citations). Kimberly Titus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Byron K. Williams, James A. Mosher, Mark R. Fuller, Merav Ben‐David, Stephen B. Lewis, Grey W. Pendleton, Mary M. Peacock, James E. Hines, R. Wesley Flynn and John W. Schoen. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Oecologia and Journal of Wildlife Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.