Kimberly Smith

508 total citations
10 papers, 305 citations indexed

About

Kimberly Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Kimberly Smith has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 305 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Health and 3 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Kimberly Smith's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers). Kimberly Smith is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers). Kimberly Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Kimberly Smith's co-authors include Shaquita Tillman, Thema Bryant‐Davis, Alison J. Marks, Yuying Tsong, Sarah E. Ullman, Elizabeth T. Welsh, Rebecca P. Cameron, Linda R. Mona, Colleen Cordes and Leslie Klein and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Trauma Violence & Abuse and Rehabilitation Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Kimberly Smith

9 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kimberly Smith United States 6 162 140 130 118 41 10 305
Fiona Mason United Kingdom 10 107 0.7× 105 0.8× 184 1.4× 114 1.0× 29 0.7× 19 365
A. Bouasker Tunisia 5 79 0.5× 190 1.4× 113 0.9× 120 1.0× 101 2.5× 15 318
Solveig Karin Bø Vatnar Norway 12 108 0.7× 326 2.3× 184 1.4× 223 1.9× 72 1.8× 35 400
Cynthia Calkins United States 11 73 0.5× 106 0.8× 247 1.9× 218 1.8× 39 1.0× 30 367
Simone C. Barr United States 7 57 0.4× 52 0.4× 133 1.0× 113 1.0× 76 1.9× 11 280
Adrienne Baldwin‐White United States 9 182 1.1× 171 1.2× 97 0.7× 154 1.3× 46 1.1× 21 315
Kristen A. Prock United States 8 204 1.3× 211 1.5× 183 1.4× 160 1.4× 113 2.8× 19 452
Véronique Jaquier United States 13 104 0.6× 271 1.9× 238 1.8× 192 1.6× 117 2.9× 23 473
Shirley Jülich New Zealand 8 59 0.4× 62 0.4× 151 1.2× 105 0.9× 70 1.7× 20 251
Genelle K. Sawyer United States 8 54 0.3× 122 0.9× 194 1.5× 123 1.0× 54 1.3× 9 326

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Smith. The network helps show where Kimberly Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly Smith. Kimberly Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
4.
López, Enrique, Kimberly Smith, Nicholas S. Thaler, et al.. (2016). Diagnostic utility of the HIV dementia scale and the international HIV dementia scale in screening for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders among Spanish-speaking adults. Applied Neuropsychology Adult. 24(6). 512–521. 6 indexed citations
5.
Bryant‐Davis, Thema, et al.. (2011). Sexual Assault Recovery in the Aftermath of the Liberian Civil War: Forging a Sisterhood between Feminist Psychology and Feminist Theology. Women & Therapy. 34(3). 314–330. 7 indexed citations
6.
Cameron, Rebecca P., Linda R. Mona, Maggie L. Syme, et al.. (2011). Sexuality among wounded veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND): Implications for rehabilitation psychologists.. Rehabilitation Psychology. 56(4). 289–301. 25 indexed citations
7.
Bryant‐Davis, Thema, Sarah E. Ullman, Yuying Tsong, Shaquita Tillman, & Kimberly Smith. (2010). Struggling to survive: Sexual assault, poverty, and mental health outcomes of African American women.. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 80(1). 61–70. 71 indexed citations
8.
Tillman, Shaquita, Thema Bryant‐Davis, Kimberly Smith, & Alison J. Marks. (2010). Shattering Silence: Exploring Barriers to Disclosure for African American Sexual Assault Survivors. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 11(2). 59–70. 163 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Kimberly, Thema Bryant‐Davis, Shaquita Tillman, & Alison J. Marks. (2010). Stifled Voices: Barriers to Help-Seeking Behavior for South African Childhood Sexual Assault Survivors. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 19(3). 255–274. 25 indexed citations
10.
Bryant‐Davis, Thema, Shaquita Tillman, Alison J. Marks, & Kimberly Smith. (2009). Millennium Abolitionists: Addressing the Sexual Trafficking of African Women. 1(1). 69–78. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026