Kimberly S. Chiew
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Surgery
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Todd S. BraverCheryl L. GradyJanette L. VardyJacqueline GalicaI. F. TannockGregory R. PondMichelle KeightleyW. Dale Stevens
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (9 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kimberly S. Chiew
28 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Cognitive Neuroscience 782
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 338
- Surgery 161
- Social Psychology 141
- Applied Psychology 124
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly S. Chiew
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly S. Chiew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly S. Chiew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly S. Chiew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly S. Chiew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly S. Chiew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly S. Chiew. The network helps show where Kimberly S. Chiew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly S. Chiew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly S. Chiew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly S. Chiew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly S. Chiew. Kimberly S. Chiew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 148 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 165 | |
| 12 | Positive emotion, reward, and cognitive control: emotional versus motivational influences | 4 |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 171 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 73 | |
| 18 | 54 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 195 |
About Kimberly S. Chiew
Kimberly S. Chiew is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (9 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (782 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (338 citations). Kimberly S. Chiew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Todd S. Braver, Cheryl L. Grady, Janette L. Vardy, Jacqueline Galica, I. F. Tannock, Gregory R. Pond, Michelle Keightley, W. Dale Stevens, Lynn Hasher and Adam C. Savine. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.