Kimberly A. Fredericks
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Public Administration top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Education
- Co-authors
- Joanne G. CarmanThomas A. Birkland
- Topics
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment (10 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers)Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Public AdministrationManagement Science and Operations ResearchIssues, ethics and legal aspects
- Journals
- American Journal of EvaluationNew Directions for EvaluationCanadian Journal of Program Evaluation
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kimberly A. Fredericks
14 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 201
- Management Science and Operations Research 163
- Public Administration 138
- General Health Professions 125
- Education 46
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly A. Fredericks
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly A. Fredericks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly A. Fredericks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly A. Fredericks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly A. Fredericks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly A. Fredericks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly A. Fredericks. The network helps show where Kimberly A. Fredericks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly A. Fredericks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly A. Fredericks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly A. Fredericks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly A. Fredericks. Kimberly A. Fredericks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 114 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | Nonprofits and evaluation | 10 |
| 6 | 96 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 166 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 11 |
About Kimberly A. Fredericks
Kimberly A. Fredericks is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Public Administration and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (10 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (138 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (163 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Kimberly A. Fredericks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joanne G. Carman and Thomas A. Birkland. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Evaluation, New Directions for Evaluation and Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.