Kimberley E. Wever

78 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Kimberley E. Wever
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Developmental Neuroscience 178
  • Small Animals 207
  • Emergency Medicine 236
  • Nephrology 166
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 150
Replace Victoria O’Collins with:
Victoria O’Collins Australia
Irene Riezzo Italy
Patrick Maison France
Kazuo Hanaoka Japan
Paul D. Woolf United States
Ingeborg Welters United Kingdom
James D. Reynolds United States
Robert F. Grover United States
Lars Mørkrid Norway
Douglas D. Fraser Canada
Kimberley E. Wever relative to Victoria O’Collins Australia Victoria O’Collins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Victoria O’Collins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberley E. Wever

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberley E. Wever's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberley E. Wever with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberley E. Wever more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberley E. Wever

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberley E. Wever. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberley E. Wever. The network helps show where Kimberley E. Wever may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kimberley E. Wever, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kimberley E. Wever Line = papers co-authored together Kimberley E. Wever links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015215
2 2017165
3 2012141
4 2014121
5 2015114
6 2018105
7 201168
8 202054
9 201750
10 201946
11 202046
12 201741
13 202140
14 201138
15 201538
16 201538
17 201536
18 201934
19 201332
20 202032

About Kimberley E. Wever

Kimberley E. Wever is a scholar working on Small Animals, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (20 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (15 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (15 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (8 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (5 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (178 citations), Small Animals (207 citations), Emergency Medicine (236 citations), Nephrology (166 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (150 citations). Kimberley E. Wever has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michiel C. Warlé, Carlijn R. Hooijmans, Merel Ritskes‐Hoitinga, Emily S. Sena, Rob B.M. de Vries, Marlies Leenaars, Rosalinde Masereeuw, Gerard A. Rongen, Miranda Langendam and Malcolm Macleod. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, European Journal of Pharmacology, PAIN Reports and PLoS Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact