Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

638 total citations
17 papers, 539 citations indexed

About

Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 539 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 7 papers in Statistics and Probability and 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers). Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers). Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger collaborates with scholars based in United States. Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger's co-authors include Edward A. Wasserman, Irving Biederman, Stuart S. Miller, Linda J. Van Hamme, Brian R. Cook, Mark S. Blumberg, Gregory J. Allen, Jennifer D. Thomas, I. Gormezano and Jennifer J. Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior and Journal of comparative psychology.

In The Last Decade

Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

17 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger United States 12 250 207 167 130 129 17 539
Masako Jitsumori Japan 13 210 0.8× 277 1.3× 141 0.8× 57 0.4× 97 0.8× 44 506
Lou M. Sherburne United States 15 178 0.7× 398 1.9× 132 0.8× 173 1.3× 89 0.7× 26 625
Janice Steirn United States 11 194 0.8× 378 1.8× 97 0.6× 137 1.1× 60 0.5× 23 549
Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves United States 14 135 0.5× 197 1.0× 135 0.8× 72 0.6× 94 0.7× 23 510
Patricia M. Blough United States 17 342 1.4× 189 0.9× 102 0.6× 173 1.3× 192 1.5× 36 767
Jessica P. Stagner United States 13 144 0.6× 387 1.9× 88 0.5× 132 1.0× 159 1.2× 21 646
Valerie D. Hollard New Zealand 7 205 0.8× 219 1.1× 92 0.6× 77 0.6× 59 0.5× 11 433
Ulrike Aust Austria 18 248 1.0× 240 1.2× 347 2.1× 119 0.9× 266 2.1× 27 808
Neil McMillan Canada 13 280 1.1× 161 0.8× 117 0.7× 36 0.3× 100 0.8× 44 555
Deborah J. Olson United States 8 259 1.0× 118 0.6× 231 1.4× 48 0.4× 225 1.7× 15 540

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger. The network helps show where Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger. Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, Edward A. Wasserman, & Irving Biederman. (2000). The pigeon's discrimination of shape and location information. Visual Cognition. 7(4). 417–436. 9 indexed citations
2.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, Edward A. Wasserman, & Irving Biederman. (1998). Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 24(1). 34–46. 45 indexed citations
3.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, Edward A. Wasserman, & Irving Biederman. (1998). Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 24(1). 34–46. 27 indexed citations
4.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim & Edward A. Wasserman. (1996). The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 22(1). 60–67. 35 indexed citations
5.
Wasserman, Edward A., et al.. (1996). The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 22(2). 205–221. 45 indexed citations
6.
Wasserman, Edward A., et al.. (1996). The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 22(2). 205–221. 33 indexed citations
7.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, Edward A. Wasserman, & Irving Biederman. (1996). EFFECTS OF SPATIAL REARRANGEMENT OF OBJECT COMPONENTS ON PICTURE RECOGNITION IN PIGEONS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 65(2). 465–475. 33 indexed citations
8.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, et al.. (1996). Cyclic responding by pigeons on the peak timing procedure.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 22(4). 447–460. 40 indexed citations
9.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim & Edward A. Wasserman. (1996). The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 22(1). 60–67. 27 indexed citations
10.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, et al.. (1996). Cyclic responding by pigeons on the peak timing procedure.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 22(4). 447–460. 27 indexed citations
11.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, et al.. (1995). Seeing and knowing: Knowledge attribution versus stimulus control in adult humans (Homo sapiens).. Journal of comparative psychology. 109(2). 107–114. 10 indexed citations
12.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, et al.. (1995). Pigeons show same^different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 21(3). 248–252. 94 indexed citations
13.
Wasserman, Edward A., et al.. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 21(3). 248–252. 56 indexed citations
14.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, et al.. (1995). Seeing and knowing: Knowledge attribution versus stimulus control in adult humans (Homo sapiens).. Journal of comparative psychology. 109(2). 107–114. 1 indexed citations
15.
Wasserman, Edward A., Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Linda J. Van Hamme, & Irving Biederman. (1993). Pigeons Are Sensitive to the Spatial Organization of Complex Visual Stimuli. Psychological Science. 4(5). 336–341. 53 indexed citations
16.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, et al.. (1992). Effects of MDA upon differential serial compound conditioning and reflex modification of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 41(2). 333–342. 1 indexed citations
17.
Kirkpatrick‐Steger, Kim, et al.. (1991). Effects of MDA on classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 39(1). 183–189. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Masako Jitsumori Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lou M. Sherburne Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janice Steirn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia M. Blough Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jessica P. Stagner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Valerie D. Hollard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ulrike Aust Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Neil McMillan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah J. Olson
Rankless by CCL
2026