Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

17 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Developmental Biology 49
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 207
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 250
  • Animal Science and Zoology 130
  • Small Animals 66
Replace Lou M. Sherburne with:
Lou M. Sherburne United States
Jacquelyne J. Rivera United States
Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves United States
Jessica P. Stagner United States
Masako Jitsumori Japan
Neil McMillan Canada
David R. Brodbeck Canada
Olga F. Lazareva United States
Patricia M. Blough United States
Julie J. Neiworth United States
Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger relative to Lou M. Sherburne United States Lou M. Sherburne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Lou M. Sherburne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger. The network helps show where Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger Line = papers co-authored together Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199594
2 199556
3 199353
4 199845
5 199645
6 199640
7 199635
8 199633
9 199633
10 199827
11 199627
12 199627
13 199510
14 20009
15 19913
16 19921
17 19951

About Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger

Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Cognitive Neuroscience, Animal Science and Zoology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (49 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (207 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (250 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (130 citations) and Small Animals (66 citations). Kim Kirkpatrick‐Steger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward A. Wasserman, Irving Biederman, Stuart S. Miller, Linda J. Van Hamme, Brian R. Cook, Jennifer D. Thomas, Mark S. Blumberg, Gregory J. Allen, I. Gormezano and Jennifer J. Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of comparative psychology, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Psychological Science, Visual Cognition and Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact