Kieu Ngo

891 citations
36 papers · 687 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Kieu Ngo

35 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers

Kieu Ngo
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Metals and Alloys 58
  • Bioengineering 126
  • Electrochemistry 90
  • Filtration and Separation 15
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 348
Replace Jonathan Reid with:
Jonathan Reid United States
Marc Raes Belgium
Lisheng Wang China
Gonzalo Galicia Aguilar Mexico
Reza Moshrefi Canada
Jérôme Dillet France
Thi Khanh Ly Nguyen France
Xia Ma China
Paweł Jóźwik Poland
Kieu Ngo relative to Jonathan Reid United States Jonathan Reid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Jonathan Reid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kieu Ngo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kieu Ngo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kieu Ngo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kieu Ngo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kieu Ngo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kieu Ngo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kieu Ngo. The network helps show where Kieu Ngo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kieu Ngo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kieu Ngo Line = papers co-authored together Kieu Ngo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2022162
2 202081
3 201156
4 200655
5 200741
6 202038
7 202034
8 200431
9 201925
10 202124
11 201821
12 202019
13 201915
14 201614
15 201411
16 202211
17 20197
18 20226
19 20205
20 20214

About Kieu Ngo

Kieu Ngo is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electrochemistry, Bioengineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (11 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (10 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (6 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (5 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (4 papers) and Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Metals and Alloys (58 citations), Bioengineering (126 citations), Electrochemistry (90 citations), Filtration and Separation (15 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (348 citations). Kieu Ngo has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Vivier, F. Huet, Oumaïma Gharbi, Samantha Michelle Gateman, Hercílio Gomes de Melo, Pascal Lauque, Khalifa Aguir, Mireille Turmine, Philippe Rousseau and Hamid Kokabi. Their work appears in journals such as Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, Electrochimica Acta, Measurement and CORROSION.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact