This map shows the geographic impact of KH Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by KH Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites KH Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by KH Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by KH Smith. The network helps show where KH Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of KH Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of KH Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of KH Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with KH Smith. KH Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Smith, KH, et al.. (2011). Innovation and Research Strategy for Growth. UTAS Research Repository.47 indexed citations
2.
Smith, KH. (2008). The challenge of environmental technology: promoting radical innovation in conditions of lock-in. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).4 indexed citations
3.
Arundel, Anthony, et al.. (2008). Surveys and Policy: Lessons from the CIS. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
4.
Smith, KH. (2008). The challenge of environmental technology: promoting radical innovation in conditions of lock-in. Final report to the Garnaut Climate Change Review. UTAS Research Repository.3 indexed citations
5.
Smith, KH. (2008). Innovation, Growth and Policy in Low and Medium Tech Industries: A Review of Recent Research. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).6 indexed citations
6.
Smith, KH, et al.. (2008). Innovation in Tasmania An Innovation Census in an Australian State. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
7.
Smith, KH, et al.. (2007). Innovation Policy, Productivity, and the Reform Agenda in Australia: A Framework for Analysis. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
8.
Smith, KH, et al.. (2007). Technological upgrading and distributed knowledge bases. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 36.2 indexed citations
9.
Moncada-Paternò-Castello, Pietro, Constantin Ciupagea, KH Smith, & Alexander Tübke. (2005). EU scoreboard reveals need for industrial R&D champs. Research-Technology Management. 48(2). 5–8.1 indexed citations
Hertog, Pim den, et al.. (2002). Usual Suspects, Hidden Treasures, Unmet Wants and Black Boxes in Innovation Research. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
12.
Smith, KH, et al.. (2001). Innovative People: Mobility of Skilled Personnel in National Innovation Systems. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).35 indexed citations
13.
Smith, KH. (2001). Innovation indicators and the knowledge economy: concepts, results and policy changes. UTAS Research Repository. 14–25.11 indexed citations
14.
Sandven, Tore & KH Smith. (2001). Innovation and economic performance at the enterprise level. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 106–116.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.