Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms
1998683 citationsAnthony Arundel et al.Research Policyprofile →
The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation
Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Arundel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Arundel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Arundel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Arundel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Arundel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Arundel. The network helps show where Anthony Arundel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony Arundel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony Arundel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony Arundel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony Arundel. Anthony Arundel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kemp, René, Anthony Arundel, Christian Rammer, et al.. (2019). Measuring Eco-Innovation for a Green Economy. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 66(4). 391–404.3 indexed citations
5.
Arundel, Anthony, Carter Walter Bloch, & Barry Ferguson. (2018). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy. 48(3). 789–798.202 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Arundel, Anthony, Carter Walter Bloch, & Barry Ferguson. (2016). Methodologies for measuring innovation in the public sector. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
7.
Arundel, Anthony, et al.. (2016). Management and Service Innovations in Australian and New Zealand Universities. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).6 indexed citations
8.
Arundel, Anthony, et al.. (2016). The role of an inclusive innovation culture and innovation support strategies in university managerial and service innovations: Survey results for Australia and New Zealand. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
9.
Arundel, Anthony, et al.. (2015). New Evidence on the Frequency, Impacts and Costs of Activities to Develop Innovations in Australian Businesses: Results from a 2015 Pilot Survey. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
10.
Arundel, Anthony, Gian Luca Casali, & Hugo Hollanders. (2015). How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).4 indexed citations
11.
Arundel, Anthony, et al.. (2014). Lessons from High Capability Innovators: Results from the 2013 Tasmanian Innovation Census. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
12.
Barjak, Franz, Nordine Es-Sadki, & Anthony Arundel. (2013). Knowledge and technology transfer performance of European universities and research institutions: Assessing the influence of institutional by-laws and practices. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
13.
Arundel, Anthony, et al.. (2012). Measuring Innovation in the Australian Public Sector. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
14.
Louwaars, N.P., et al.. (2009). Breeding business : the future of plant breeding in the light of developments in patent rights and plant breeder's rights. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).28 indexed citations
15.
Sawaya, David B. & Anthony Arundel. (2009). Agbio:a developing story. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
16.
Arundel, Anthony, Edward Lorenz, Bengt‐Åke Lundvall, & Antoine Valeyre. (2006). The Organization of Work and Innovative Performance A comparison of the EU-15. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1–36.12 indexed citations
17.
Arundel, Anthony. (2005). From the 19th to the 21st Century: Indicators for the Knowledge Economy. UTAS Research Repository.3 indexed citations
18.
Mytelka, Lynn Krieger, et al.. (2004). Designing a policy-relevant innovation survey for NEPAD. UNU Collections (United Nations University).12 indexed citations
19.
Ullrich, Hanns, Joseph Straus, Anthony Arundel, et al.. (1999). Report on "Strategic Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in the context of Science and Technology Policy" as member of the ETAN expert group (European Technology Assessment Network). MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).5 indexed citations
20.
Arundel, Anthony, et al.. (1986). Indirect health effects of relative humidity in indoor environments.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 65. 351–361.409 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.