Kevin Osborn
-
- Quantum and electron transport phenomena 23
- Mechanical and Optical Resonators 5
- Quantum optics and atomic interactions 4
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 15
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Quantum Information and Cryptography 15
- Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture 5
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Superconducting and THz Device Technology 6
-
- Semiconductor materials and devices 5
Kevin Osborn
41 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
- Condensed Matter Physics 321
- Artificial Intelligence 719
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 128
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 319
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Osborn
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Osborn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Osborn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Osborn. The network helps show where Kevin Osborn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kevin Osborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 6 | Reversible Fluxon Logic: Topological particles enable gates beyond the standard adiabatic limit | 2018 | 3 |
| 7 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 9 | Flux Solitons Studied for Energy-Conserving Reversible Computing | 2015 | 1 |
| 10 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 56 | |
| 15 | Elimination of two level fluctuators in superconducting quantum bits by an epitaxial tunnel barrier | NIST | 2006 | 1 |
| 16 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 17 | Decoherence in Josephson Qubits from Dielectric Lossbreakdown → | 2005 | 539 |
| 18 | Simultaneous State Measurement of Coupled Josephson Phase Qubitsbreakdown → | 2005 | 228 |
| 19 | 2005 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 7 |
About Kevin Osborn
Kevin Osborn is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (23 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (15 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (15 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (6 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (5 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (321 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (719 citations). Kevin Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include R. W. Simmonds, Katarina Cicak, Seongshik Oh, David P. Pappas, Ken B. Cooper, R. McDermott, Matthias Steffen, John M. Martinis, M. Ansmann and Clare C. Yu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.