Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Coherent Josephson Qubit Suitable for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits
2013452 citationsR. Barends, J. Kelly et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Planar superconducting resonators with internal quality factors above one million
2012281 citationsA. Megrant, C. Neill et al.Applied Physics Lettersprofile →
Fast Accurate State Measurement with Superconducting Qubits
2014261 citationsE. Jeffrey, D. Sank et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Chiaro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Chiaro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Chiaro more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Chiaro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Chiaro. The network helps show where B. Chiaro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Chiaro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Chiaro.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Chiaro based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Chiaro. B. Chiaro is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vainsencher, A., B. Chiaro, Roberto Collins, et al.. (2019). Superconducting qubit control electronics - Part 1/2: system overview and control hardware. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2019.
3.
Chiaro, B., et al.. (2019). Growth and preservation of entanglement in a many-body localized system. arXiv (Cornell University).12 indexed citations
4.
Kelly, J., Zijun Chen, B. Chiaro, Brooks Foxen, & John M. Martinis. (2019). Operating and Characterizing of a 72 Superconducting Qubit Processor ``Bristlecone'': Part 1. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2019.3 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Yu, Chris Quintana, Dvir Kafri, et al.. (2018). Progress Towards Quantum Annealer v2.0 I: Hardware. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018.
6.
Chen, Yu, Chris Quintana, Dvir Kafri, et al.. (2017). Progress towards a small-scale quantum annealer I: Architecture. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017.1 indexed citations
7.
Kelly, J., Erik Lucero, Brooks Foxen, et al.. (2017). 3D integration of superconducting qubits with bump bonds: Part 2. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017.1 indexed citations
Jeffrey, E., D. Sank, J. Mutus, et al.. (2014). Fast Accurate State Measurement with Superconducting Qubits. Physical Review Letters. 112(19). 190504–190504.261 indexed citations breakdown →
Megrant, A., C. Neill, R. Barends, et al.. (2012). Planar superconducting resonators with internal quality factors above one million. Applied Physics Letters. 100(11).281 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.