Kevin Mahoney
- Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 4
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 3
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 2
- Child and Adolescent Health 2
- Health Information Management top 10%
-
- Healthcare innovation and challenges 6
-
- Healthcare Policy and Management 5
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 2
-
- Diversity and Career in Medicine 2
- Co-authors
- David A. AschRaina M. MerchantAustin S. KilaruHeather GriffisJohn C. HersheyShawndra HillRachel M. WernerYoonhee P. Ha
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Kevin Mahoney
27 papers receiving 422 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Health 107
- General Health Professions 210
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
- Health Information Management 21
- Communication 31
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Mahoney
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Mahoney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Mahoney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Mahoney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Mahoney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Mahoney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Mahoney. The network helps show where Kevin Mahoney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kevin Mahoney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 144 | |
| 17 | Case series evaluation: The use of Allevyn gentle border multisite on chronic wounds | 2012 | 1 |
| 18 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 26 |
About Kevin Mahoney
Kevin Mahoney is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, General Health Professions and Family Practice, having authored 28 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (6 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (107 citations), General Health Professions (210 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations). Kevin Mahoney has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include David A. Asch, Raina M. Merchant, Austin S. Kilaru, Heather Griffis, John C. Hershey, Shawndra Hill, Rachel M. Werner, Yoonhee P. Ha, Christian Terwiesch and Roy Rosin. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.