Kevin Eaton
About
In The Last Decade
Kevin Eaton
9 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Surgery 188
- Epidemiology 111
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 89
- General Health Professions 83
- Rheumatology 78
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Eaton
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Eaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Eaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Eaton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Eaton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Eaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Eaton. The network helps show where Kevin Eaton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin Eaton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin Eaton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin Eaton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin Eaton. Kevin Eaton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 105 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 127 | |
| 9 | Skin care for patients receiving radiotherapy. | 12 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.