Kenneth M. Roberts
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Communication top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Erik WibbelsMoisés ArceRobert C. LiebermanThomas B. PepinskySuzanne MettlerRichard M. ValellyPhilip OxhornJohn Burdick
- Topics
- Politics and Society in Latin America (21 papers)Populism, Right-Wing Movements (17 papers)Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChile
In The Last Decade
Kenneth M. Roberts
59 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Political Science and International Relations 1.8k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
- Communication 183
- Economics and Econometrics 177
- Strategy and Management 124
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth M. Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth M. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth M. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth M. Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth M. Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth M. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth M. Roberts. The network helps show where Kenneth M. Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth M. Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth M. Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth M. Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth M. Roberts. Kenneth M. Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 5 | 75 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 81 | |
| 12 | Beyond neoliberalism in Latin America? : societies and politics at the crossroads | 49 |
| 13 | Es posible una socialdemocracia en América Latina | 8 |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 152 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Trends in sports in Nigeria. | 1 |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Kenneth M. Roberts
Kenneth M. Roberts is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (21 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (17 papers) and Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.8k citations), Development (120 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations). Kenneth M. Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Erik Wibbels, Moisés Arce, Robert C. Lieberman, Thomas B. Pepinsky, Suzanne Mettler, Richard M. Valelly, Philip Oxhorn, John Burdick, Jennifer McCoy and Lisa Zanotti. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and World Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.