Kenneth E. Hoff

1.3k total citations
11 papers, 957 citations indexed

About

Kenneth E. Hoff is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenneth E. Hoff has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 957 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and 2 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in Kenneth E. Hoff's work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (8 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (6 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (6 papers). Kenneth E. Hoff is often cited by papers focused on Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (8 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (6 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (6 papers). Kenneth E. Hoff collaborates with scholars based in United States. Kenneth E. Hoff's co-authors include Dinesh Manocha, John Keyser, Tim Culver, Hansong Zhang, Tom Hudson, Ming C. Lin, Rui Bastos, Anselmo Lastra, Subodh Kumar and Mary C. Whitton and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Graphics Tools and XRDS Crossroads The ACM Magazine for Students.

In The Last Decade

Kenneth E. Hoff

11 papers receiving 844 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kenneth E. Hoff United States 9 689 617 364 122 75 11 957
Tim Culver United States 11 490 0.7× 404 0.7× 366 1.0× 116 1.0× 69 0.9× 15 832
Sylvain Lazard France 17 321 0.5× 308 0.5× 225 0.6× 112 0.9× 43 0.6× 65 659
Kevin Weiler United States 7 561 0.8× 284 0.5× 383 1.1× 47 0.4× 49 0.7× 10 793
Jonathan Shade United Kingdom 7 1.1k 1.6× 1.2k 2.0× 482 1.3× 65 0.5× 141 1.9× 8 1.5k
Brian Von Herzen United States 10 259 0.4× 269 0.4× 181 0.5× 64 0.5× 31 0.4× 16 573
David Novotný United Kingdom 12 238 0.3× 637 1.0× 311 0.9× 194 1.6× 30 0.4× 32 901
Chen-Hsuan Lin United States 10 421 0.6× 616 1.0× 480 1.3× 111 0.9× 13 0.2× 26 983
Carlos Hernández Mexico 14 208 0.3× 936 1.5× 95 0.3× 143 1.2× 47 0.6× 35 1.2k
Riccardo Scopigno Italy 18 264 0.4× 260 0.4× 161 0.4× 68 0.6× 77 1.0× 83 1.1k
Yiyi Liao China 15 263 0.4× 827 1.3× 270 0.7× 307 2.5× 24 0.3× 41 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth E. Hoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth E. Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth E. Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth E. Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth E. Hoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth E. Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth E. Hoff. The network helps show where Kenneth E. Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth E. Hoff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth E. Hoff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth E. Hoff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth E. Hoff. Kenneth E. Hoff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Hoff, Kenneth E., et al.. (2002). Fast 3D Geometric Proximity Queries between Rigid and Deformable Models Using Graphics Hardware Acceleration. 15 indexed citations
2.
Kim, Young J., et al.. (2002). Closest Point Query among the Union of Convex Polytopes Using Rasterization Hardware. Journal of Graphics Tools. 7(4). 43–51. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hoff, Kenneth E., et al.. (2001). Fast and simple 2D geometric proximity queries using graphics hardware. 145–148. 92 indexed citations
4.
Hoff, Kenneth E., Tim Culver, John Keyser, Ming C. Lin, & Dinesh Manocha. (2000). Fast computation of generalized Voronoi diagrams using graphics hardware. 375–376. 52 indexed citations
5.
Bastos, Rui, et al.. (1999). Increased photorealism for interactive architectural walkthroughs. 183–190. 29 indexed citations
6.
Hoff, Kenneth E., et al.. (1999). Fast computation of generalized Voronoi diagrams using graphics hardware. 277–286. 431 indexed citations
7.
Aliaga, Daniel G., Jonathan Cohen, Hansong Zhang, et al.. (1998). A Framework for the Real-Time Walkthrough of Massive Models. 22 indexed citations
8.
Kumar, Subodh, Dinesh Manocha, Hansong Zhang, & Kenneth E. Hoff. (1997). Accelerated walkthrough of large spline models. 91–ff.. 23 indexed citations
9.
Hoff, Kenneth E.. (1997). Faster 3D game graphics by not drawing what is not seen. XRDS Crossroads The ACM Magazine for Students. 3(4). 20–23. 1 indexed citations
10.
Zhang, Hansong & Kenneth E. Hoff. (1997). Fast backface culling using normal masks. 103–ff.. 55 indexed citations
11.
Zhang, Hansong, Dinesh Manocha, Tom Hudson, & Kenneth E. Hoff. (1997). Visibility culling using hierarchical occlusion maps. 77–88. 232 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026