Kenneth D. Plowman
- Communication top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Topics
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication (12 papers)Media Studies and Communication (7 papers)Corporate Identity and Reputation (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPublic Relations ReviewJournal of Public Relations Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kenneth D. Plowman
17 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Communication 244
- Sociology and Political Science 130
- Strategy and Management 70
- Social Psychology 62
- Political Science and International Relations 59
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth D. Plowman
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth D. Plowman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth D. Plowman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth D. Plowman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth D. Plowman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth D. Plowman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth D. Plowman. The network helps show where Kenneth D. Plowman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth D. Plowman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth D. Plowman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth D. Plowman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth D. Plowman. Kenneth D. Plowman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Transparency and City Government Communications | 3 |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Corporate Identity and Corporate Reputation in Silicon Valley: Case Studies in Public Relations and Integrated Communications | 3 |
| 13 | 121 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 23 |
About Kenneth D. Plowman
Kenneth D. Plowman is a scholar working on Communication, Strategy and Management and Public Administration, having authored 18 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Relations and Crisis Communication (12 papers), Media Studies and Communication (7 papers) and Corporate Identity and Reputation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (244 citations), Public Administration (33 citations) and Strategy and Management (70 citations). Kenneth D. Plowman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Wilson, Robert I. Wakefield, Soojin Kim, Arunima Krishna and Brad Rawlins. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Public Relations Review and Journal of Public Relations Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.