Kengo Gotoh
About
In The Last Decade
Kengo Gotoh
5 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Molecular Biology 896
- Plant Science 574
- Genetics 195
- Cancer Research 144
- Genetics 121
Countries citing papers authored by Kengo Gotoh
This map shows the geographic impact of Kengo Gotoh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kengo Gotoh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kengo Gotoh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kengo Gotoh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kengo Gotoh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kengo Gotoh. The network helps show where Kengo Gotoh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kengo Gotoh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kengo Gotoh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kengo Gotoh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kengo Gotoh. Kengo Gotoh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 138 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 204 | |
| 5 | DNA methylation of retrotransposon genes is regulated by Piwi family members MILI and MIWI2 in murine fetal testes breakdown → | 720 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.