Ken Van Rees

964 total citations
28 papers, 728 citations indexed

About

Ken Van Rees is a scholar working on Soil Science, Plant Science and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Ken Van Rees has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 728 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Soil Science, 9 papers in Plant Science and 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Ken Van Rees's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (6 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (5 papers). Ken Van Rees is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (6 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (5 papers). Ken Van Rees collaborates with scholars based in Canada, France and Taiwan. Ken Van Rees's co-authors include Rosalind Bueckert, Yantai Gan, Beyhan Y. Amichev, D.J. Pennock, Liping Liu, Liping Liu, Colin P. Laroque, Vladimir Vujanovic, Brad Seely and Clive Welham and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Soil Science Society of America Journal and Geoderma.

In The Last Decade

Ken Van Rees

28 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Ken Van Rees

ACS

GPC

ECOLO

Ken C.J. Van Rees Canada

Mari–Vaughn V. Johnson United States

Antti Wall Finland

Yo Toma Japan

Dick L. Gebhart United States

N. Gomez‐Casanovas United States

Suzanna Lettens Belgium

Sarah S. Roley United States

Sissou Zakari China

Ken C.J. Van Rees Canada

Ken Van Rees

298 ×1.2

157 ×0.7

248 ×1.4

ACS

292 ×1.7

GPC

147 ×1.5

ECOLO

Citations per year, relative to Ken Van Rees Ken Van Rees (= 1×) peers Ken C.J. Van Rees

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Van Rees

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Van Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Van Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Van Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Van Rees

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Van Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Van Rees. The network helps show where Ken Van Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken Van Rees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken Van Rees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken Van Rees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ken Van Rees. Ken Van Rees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rees, Ken Van. (2024). The soil zones of Saskatchewan: Creating art to visualize the concept. iScience. 27(3). 109335–109335. 1 indexed citations

Emilson, Caroline E., Teresita M. Porter, Dave Morris, et al.. (2022). Forest soil biotic communities show few responses to wood ash applications at multiple sites across Canada. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 4171–4171. 10 indexed citations

Diochon, Amanda, Dave Morris, Lisa Venier, et al.. (2022). Limited effect of wood ash application on soil quality as indicated by a multisite assessment of soil organic matter attributes. GCB Bioenergy. 14(5). 500–521. 7 indexed citations

Amichev, Beyhan Y., Colin P. Laroque, & Ken Van Rees. (2021). Shelterbelt Management Practices for Maximized Ecosystem Carbon Stocks on Agricultural Landscapes in Saskatchewan, Canada. Environmental Management. 68(4). 522–538. 2 indexed citations

Emilson, Caroline E., Nicolas Bélanger, Suzanne Brais, et al.. (2019). Short‐term growth response of jack pine and spruce spp. to wood ash amendment across Canada. GCB Bioenergy. 12(2). 158–167. 11 indexed citations

Laroque, Colin P., et al.. (2019). Above- and Below-Ground Carbon Sequestration in Shelterbelt Trees in Canada: A Review. Forests. 10(10). 922–922. 26 indexed citations

Sanscartier, David, et al.. (2017). Life‐cycle assessment of torrefied coppice willow co‐firing with lignite coal in an existing pulverized coal boiler. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 11(5). 830–846. 9 indexed citations

Kulshreshtha, Suren, et al.. (2017). Costs and benefits of shelterbelts: A review of producers' perception and min map analysis for Saskatchewan, Canada. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 16 indexed citations

Piwowar, Joseph M., Beyhan Y. Amichev, & Ken Van Rees. (2016). The Saskatchewan Shelterbelt Inventory. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 18 indexed citations

10.

Rees, Ken Van, et al.. (2016). Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of shelterbelts: estimating farm-scale emission reductions using the Holos model. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 12 indexed citations

11.

Amichev, Beyhan Y., et al.. (2016). Carbon sequestration and growth of six common tree and shrub shelterbelts in Saskatchewan, Canada. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 17 indexed citations

12.

Hartemink, Alfred E., Megan R. Balks, Zueng‐Sang Chen, et al.. (2013). The joy of teaching soil science. Geoderma. 217-218. 1–9. 54 indexed citations

13.

Davis, Emma L., Colin P. Laroque, & Ken Van Rees. (2012). Evaluating the suitability of nine shelterbelt species for dendrochronological purposes in the Canadian Prairies. Agroforestry Systems. 87(3). 713–727. 13 indexed citations

14.

Rees, Ken Van, et al.. (2012). Changes in root-associated fungal assemblages within newly established clonal biomass plantations of Salix spp.. Forest Ecology and Management. 282. 105–114. 16 indexed citations

15.

Volk, Timothy A., Lawrence P. Abrahamson, Kimberly D. Cameron, et al.. (2011). Yields of willow biomass crops across a range of sites in North America. Aspects of applied biology. 67–74. 53 indexed citations

16.

Liu, Liping, Yantai Gan, Rosalind Bueckert, & Ken Van Rees. (2011). Rooting systems of oilseed and pulse crops I: Temporal growth patterns across the plant developmental periods. Field Crops Research. 122(3). 256–263. 52 indexed citations

17.

Miller, Richard E., et al.. (2005). Progress towards more uniform assessment and reporting of soil disturbance for operations, research, and sustainability protocols. Forest Ecology and Management. 220(1-3). 17–30. 37 indexed citations

18.

Rees, Ken Van, et al.. (2002). Cultivation‐Induced Effects on Belowground Biomass and Organic Carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 66(3). 924–930. 51 indexed citations

19.

Rees, Ken Van, et al.. (2002). Cultivation-Induced Effects on Belowground Biomass and Organic Carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 66(3). 924–924. 25 indexed citations

20.

Twiss, Michael R., Claude Fortin, Peter G. C. Campbell, et al.. (2001). Coupling the use of computer chemical speciation models and culture techniques in laboratory investigations of trace metal toxicity. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability. 13(1). 9–24. 70 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact