Ken Lodge

608 citations
28 papers · 174 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Lodge

24 papers receiving 125 citations

Peers

Ken Lodge
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Linguistics and Language 108
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
  • Language and Linguistics 86
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 23
  • Artificial Intelligence 45
Replace Chin-Chuan Cheng with:
Chin-Chuan Cheng Taiwan
Stefanie Jannedy Germany
Sam Kirkham United Kingdom
Laurel MacKenzie United States
Ellen van Zanten Netherlands
Janneke Van Hofwegen United States
Karen Steffen Chung Taiwan
Edward T. Purcell United States
Beth Zielinski Australia
Haike Jacobs Netherlands
Ken Lodge relative to Chin-Chuan Cheng Taiwan Chin-Chuan Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Chin-Chuan Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Lodge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Lodge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Lodge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Lodge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Lodge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Lodge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Lodge. The network helps show where Ken Lodge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Ken Lodge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Lodge Line = papers co-authored together Ken Lodge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197920
2
A Critical Introduction to Phonetics
200919
3 199518
4
Another Travesty of Representation: Phonological Representation and Phonetic Interpretation of ATR Harmony in Kalenjin.
199615
5 200411
6 20078
7 19928
8 20037
9 20097
10 20097
11 19936
12 19786
13 19815
14 19734
15 20074
16 20154
17 19834
18 20034
19 19863
20 19973

About Ken Lodge

Ken Lodge is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Education, having authored 28 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (15 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (13 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (7 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (2 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (108 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations), Language and Linguistics (86 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (23 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (45 citations). Ken Lodge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Local, Jean Boase‐Beier, Terry Bossomaier and David Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Lingua, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Journal of Linguistics, English Language and Linguistics and Journal of Child Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact