Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Bad Jobs in America: Standard and Nonstandard Employment Relations and Job Quality in the United States
2000846 citationsArne L. Kalleberg, Barbara F. Reskin et al.American Sociological Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Hudson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Hudson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Hudson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Hudson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Hudson. The network helps show where Ken Hudson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken Hudson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken Hudson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken Hudson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ken Hudson. Ken Hudson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Hudson, Ken, et al.. (2020). Voices of Partnerships within the Critical Service-Learning Framework. 12(2). 17–25.1 indexed citations
2.
Hudson, Ken & Mark E. Nissen. (2011). Understanding the Potential of Virtual Environments for Improving C2 Performance. Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School).1 indexed citations
3.
Hudson, Ken. (2010). How to Innovate @ Speed. 37(2). 24.1 indexed citations
4.
Hudson, Ken & Mark E. Nissen. (2010). Command and control in virtual environments: designing a virtual environment for experimentation. Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School).3 indexed citations
Hudson, Ken, Robert Pollin, & Stephanie Luce. (2000). The Living Wage: Building a Fair Economy. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 29(1). 263–263.100 indexed citations
13.
Kalleberg, Arne L., Barbara F. Reskin, & Ken Hudson. (2000). Bad Jobs in America: Standard and Nonstandard Employment Relations and Job Quality in the United States. American Sociological Review. 65(2). 256–256.846 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Spalter-Roth, Roberta, Arne L. Kalleberg, Naomi Cassirer, et al.. (1997). Managing Work and Family. Nonstandard Work Arrangements among Managers and Professionals..9 indexed citations
15.
Kalleberg, Arne L., Naomi Cassirer, Barbara F. Reskin, et al.. (1997). Nonstandard Work Substandard Jobs: Flexible Work Arrangements in the U. S..78 indexed citations
16.
Hudson, Ken. (1996). ATLANTA'S TRANSIT SYSTEM `TRAINS' FOR 1996 OLYMPICS. 111(1).1 indexed citations
17.
Hudson, Ken. (1996). DESPITE SETBACKS, ATLANTA'S BIG WHEELS KEEP ON TURNING. 111(8).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.