Kellie Sherlock
About
In The Last Decade
Kellie Sherlock
7 papers receiving 273 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Toxicology 96
- Sociology and Political Science 84
- Clinical Psychology 78
- Pharmacology 76
- Applied Psychology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Kellie Sherlock
This map shows the geographic impact of Kellie Sherlock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kellie Sherlock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kellie Sherlock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kellie Sherlock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kellie Sherlock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kellie Sherlock. The network helps show where Kellie Sherlock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kellie Sherlock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kellie Sherlock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kellie Sherlock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kellie Sherlock. Kellie Sherlock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 103 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 65 | |
| 7 | 54 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.