Stephen Bright
Impact in
- Toxicology top 2%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 8
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 17
- Co-authors
- Monica J. Barratt (5 shared papers)Ali Marsh (4 shared papers)Brian Bishop (3 shared papers)Robert Kane (3 shared papers)Petra Skeffington (4 shared papers)Leigh M. Smith (1 shared paper)Cylie Williams (3 shared papers)Matthew Allen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (6 papers)Addiction Research & Theory (4 papers)Journal of Humanistic Psychology (3 papers)Australasian Journal on Ageing (2 papers)Australian Psychologist (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Stephen Bright
43 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Toxicology 81
- Clinical Psychology 212
- Applied Psychology 22
- Pharmacology 72
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 74
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Bright
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Bright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Bright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Bright. The network helps show where Stephen Bright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Bright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 8 |
About Stephen Bright
Stephen Bright is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Toxicology, Sensory Systems and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (17 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (11 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (81 citations), Clinical Psychology (212 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations), Pharmacology (72 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (74 citations). Stephen Bright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Monica J. Barratt, Ali Marsh, Brian Bishop, Robert Kane, Petra Skeffington, Leigh M. Smith, Cylie Williams, Matthew Allen, M.L. Williams and Greg E. Dear. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Addiction Research & Theory, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Australasian Journal on Ageing and Australian Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.