Keito Boki

75 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Keito Boki
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Water Science and Technology 97
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 51
  • Biomaterials 67
  • Food Science 81
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 11
Replace Francisco Ríos with:
Francisco Ríos Spain
Tomasz Koźlecki Poland
Sang-Kyu Kam South Korea
Xiangyu Gu China
Karolina Gdula Poland
Yao Huang China
S.C Dhingra India
Muhammad Muhammad Indonesia
Técia Vieira Carvalho Brazil
Dennis J. O’Brien United States
Keito Boki relative to Francisco Ríos Spain Francisco Ríos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Francisco Ríos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keito Boki

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keito Boki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keito Boki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keito Boki more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keito Boki

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keito Boki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keito Boki. The network helps show where Keito Boki may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keito Boki, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keito Boki Line = papers co-authored together Keito Boki links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199243
2 199225
3 199125
4 197424
5 198922
6 199421
7 197819
8 199017
9
Milk and Dairy Products, Post-harvest Losses and Food Safety in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Near East.
200316
10 198015
11 198212
12 197712
13 198711
14 199111
15 199110
16
Study on hydrophilic properties of gelatin as a clinical wound dressing. II. Water-absorbing property and hemostatic effect of gelatin.
19939
17 19809
18 19789
19 19949
20 20078

About Keito Boki

Keito Boki is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Biomaterials, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 77 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (13 papers), Industrial Gas Emission Control (11 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (9 papers), Food composition and properties (7 papers), Collagen: Extraction and Characterization (7 papers), Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (6 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (5 papers) and Food Quality and Safety Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (97 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (51 citations), Biomaterials (67 citations), Food Science (81 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (11 citations). Keito Boki has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and Albania. Frequent co-authors include Seiki Tanada, Naohito Kawasaki, Takamichi Tamura, Tetsuyuki Wada, Hitoshi Takahashi, Takashi Kita, Masae Takahashi, Takeo Nakamura, T Miyoshi and Seiko Shimizu. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Journal of Food Science, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society and Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact