Keith Schimmel

1.2k total citations
54 papers, 905 citations indexed

About

Keith Schimmel is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Schimmel has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 905 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 8 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 6 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Keith Schimmel's work include Extraction and Separation Processes (5 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (5 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (4 papers). Keith Schimmel is often cited by papers focused on Extraction and Separation Processes (5 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (5 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (4 papers). Keith Schimmel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Austria and Morocco. Keith Schimmel's co-authors include Abolghasem Shahbazi, Lijun Wang, Vinayak N. Kabadi, Shamsuddin Ilias, Mulumebet Worku, Ellie H. Fini, Alireza Samieadel, Mohammad Rafati, David C. Dayton and Salam A. Ibrahim and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioresource Technology, Trends in Food Science & Technology and Energy Conversion and Management.

In The Last Decade

Keith Schimmel

45 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Keith Schimmel United States 17 332 138 112 112 90 54 905
Marek Kułażyński Poland 18 317 1.0× 238 1.7× 70 0.6× 79 0.7× 70 0.8× 56 871
Huirong Zhang China 21 296 0.9× 230 1.7× 169 1.5× 158 1.4× 64 0.7× 99 1.4k
Ramaraj Boopathy United States 20 270 0.8× 49 0.4× 143 1.3× 161 1.4× 50 0.6× 48 1.1k
Jiacheng Shen United States 18 637 1.9× 111 0.8× 188 1.7× 119 1.1× 24 0.3× 51 1.1k
José Luis Rico Mexico 22 313 0.9× 175 1.3× 66 0.6× 236 2.1× 71 0.8× 47 1.4k
Ke Zhao China 16 268 0.8× 145 1.1× 93 0.8× 131 1.2× 42 0.5× 31 1.1k
Ángel Sánchez Spain 17 394 1.2× 68 0.5× 134 1.2× 86 0.8× 20 0.2× 85 990
Vittoria Benedetti Italy 19 526 1.6× 228 1.7× 40 0.4× 94 0.8× 105 1.2× 32 934
Agnieszka A. Pilarska Poland 19 314 0.9× 72 0.5× 67 0.6× 92 0.8× 20 0.2× 83 1.2k
Tao Luo China 19 419 1.3× 103 0.7× 97 0.9× 188 1.7× 16 0.2× 46 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Schimmel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Schimmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Schimmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Schimmel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Schimmel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Schimmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Schimmel. The network helps show where Keith Schimmel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Schimmel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Schimmel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Schimmel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Schimmel. Keith Schimmel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Matthews, Nicole L., et al.. (2024). Building capacity for inclusive informal STEM learning opportunities for autistic learners. International Journal of STEM Education. 11(1).
2.
Pellis, Neal R., et al.. (2024). Integrating Research Into The Undergraduate Curriculum Nasa's Microgravity Bioreactor. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 4.329.1–4.329.9.
3.
Gumpertz, Marcia L., et al.. (2024). An Institutional Transformation Model to Increase Minority STEM Doctoral Student Success. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 2 indexed citations
4.
Shahbazi, Abolghasem, et al.. (2023). Aspen Plus simulation of Chemical Looping Combustion of syngas and methane in fluidized beds. 3(1). 6 indexed citations
5.
Schimmel, Keith, et al.. (2022). Carbon negative transportation fuels – A techno-economic-environmental analysis of biomass pathways for transportation. Energy Conversion and Management X. 14. 100208–100208. 18 indexed citations
6.
Bentley, J.M., et al.. (2020). Polymer directed synthesis of NiO nanoflowers to remove pollutant from wastewater. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 324. 114676–114676. 16 indexed citations
7.
Pei, Ya, et al.. (2020). Effect of quercetin on nonshivering thermogenesis of brown adipose tissue in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 88. 108532–108532. 62 indexed citations
8.
Yalo, Nicaise, Steven J. Berg, Andre R. Erler, et al.. (2020). High-Resolution, Integrated Hydrological Modeling of Climate Change Impacts on a Semi-Arid Urban Watershed in Niamey, Niger. Water. 12(2). 364–364. 14 indexed citations
10.
Bahrami, Akbar, et al.. (2019). Efficiency of novel processing technologies for the control of Listeria monocytogenes in food products. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 96. 61–78. 88 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Lijun, et al.. (2017). Characterization of the physicochemical and structural evolution of biomass particles during combined pyrolysis and CO2 gasification. Journal of the Energy Institute. 92(1). 82–93. 58 indexed citations
12.
Xiu, Shuangning, et al.. (2016). Uses of miscanthus press juice within a green biorefinery platform. Bioresource Technology. 207. 285–292. 17 indexed citations
13.
Xiu, Shuangning, et al.. (2016). Effects of fertilizer application and dry/wet processing of Miscanthus x giganteus on bioethanol production. Bioresource Technology. 204. 98–105. 20 indexed citations
14.
Rafati, Mohammad, Lijun Wang, David C. Dayton, et al.. (2016). Techno-economic analysis of production of Fischer-Tropsch liquids via biomass gasification: The effects of Fischer-Tropsch catalysts and natural gas co-feeding. Energy Conversion and Management. 133. 153–166. 112 indexed citations
15.
Bililign, Solomon, et al.. (2015). A university without departments and colleges -A new structure to strengthen disciplinary and interdisciplinary education and research. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research. 3(11). 117–130. 1 indexed citations
16.
Jha, Manoj K., et al.. (2014). Subseasonal climate variability for North Carolina, United States. Atmospheric Research. 145-146. 69–79. 24 indexed citations
17.
Shahbazi, Abolghasem, et al.. (2013). Optimization of cultural conditions for conversion of glycerol to ethanol by Enterobacter aerogenes S012. AMB Express. 3(1). 12–12. 17 indexed citations
18.
Shahbazi, Abolghasem, et al.. (2012). Bioconversion of glycerol to ethanol by a mutant Enterobacter aerogenes. AMB Express. 2(1). 20–20. 34 indexed citations
19.
Ohimain, Elijah I., et al.. (2003). Preservation of Niger Delta wetland resources through proper handling and rehabilitation of abandoned waste sulfidic dredge spoils.. 3–12. 4 indexed citations
20.
Brooks, Scott C., et al.. (2003). Factors affecting microbial uranium reduction: implications for bioremediation.. 99–109. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026