Keith H. Black
- Finance top 5%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 22
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies 4
- Accounting top 10%
- Corporate Finance and Governance 6
- Private Equity and Venture Capital 4
- Risk Management in Financial Firms 3
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Market Dynamics and Volatility 8
- Insurance and Financial Risk Management 4
-
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 5
- Co-authors
- Donald R. ChambersAssociatesMark J. P. Anson
- Journals
- The Journal of Alternative Investments (4 papers)The Journal of Investing (1 paper)The journal of wealth management (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Keith H. Black
40 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Finance 146
- Accounting 78
- Economics and Econometrics 122
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22
- Strategy and Management 39
Countries citing papers authored by Keith H. Black
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith H. Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith H. Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith H. Black more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keith H. Black
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith H. Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith H. Black. The network helps show where Keith H. Black may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Keith H. Black, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 3 | CAIA Level I : An Introduction to Core Topics in Alternative Investments Ed. 2 | 2012 | 3 |
| 4 | CAIA level II : advanced core topics in alternative investments | 2012 | 2 |
| 5 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 32 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 1 |
About Keith H. Black
Keith H. Black is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (22 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (4 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (4 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (4 papers) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (146 citations), Accounting (78 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (122 citations). Keith H. Black has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donald R. Chambers, Associates and Mark J. P. Anson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Alternative Investments, The Journal of Investing and The journal of wealth management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.