Keith Clayton
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Earth-Surface Processes top 5%
- Soil Science top 5%
- Water Science and Technology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard J. ChorleyBarbara A. KennedyKevin J. EdwardsJ. C. DoornkampCuchlaine A. M. KingMark A. SchmucklerDavid L. GildenPhilip L. Gibbard
- Topics
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers)Geological formations and processes (3 papers)Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological ReviewJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionGeomorphology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Keith Clayton
21 papers receiving 692 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Atmospheric Science 310
- Ecology 212
- Earth-Surface Processes 207
- Soil Science 139
- Water Science and Technology 125
Countries citing papers authored by Keith Clayton
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Clayton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Clayton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Clayton. The network helps show where Keith Clayton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Clayton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Clayton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Clayton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Clayton. Keith Clayton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 185 | |
| 17 | The glaciated river basins of Eastern England | 1 |
| 18 | 330 | |
| 19 | 70 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Keith Clayton
Keith Clayton is a scholar working on Earth-Surface Processes, Atmospheric Science and Anthropology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Geological formations and processes (3 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (207 citations), Atmospheric Science (310 citations) and Soil Science (139 citations). Keith Clayton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Chorley, Barbara A. Kennedy, Kevin J. Edwards, J. C. Doornkamp, Cuchlaine A. M. King, Mark A. Schmuckler, David L. Gilden and Philip L. Gibbard. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition and Geomorphology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.