Kei‐ichi Maeda
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 1%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Oceanography top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (45 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (34 papers)Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Kei‐ichi Maeda
60 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.6k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.3k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 267
- Oceanography 143
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 104
Countries citing papers authored by Kei‐ichi Maeda
This map shows the geographic impact of Kei‐ichi Maeda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kei‐ichi Maeda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kei‐ichi Maeda more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kei‐ichi Maeda
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kei‐ichi Maeda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kei‐ichi Maeda. The network helps show where Kei‐ichi Maeda may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kei‐ichi Maeda
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kei‐ichi Maeda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kei‐ichi Maeda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kei‐ichi Maeda. Kei‐ichi Maeda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Preface(Higher Dimensional Black Holes) | 1 |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | The Origin of Fractal Distribution in Self-Gravitating Virialized System and Self-Organized Criticality | 1 |
| 14 | Chaos in Static Axisymmetric Spacetimes | 4 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | Quantum physics and the universe | 13 |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | Einstein gravity as an attractor in higher-dimensional theories | 2 |
| 19 | A history of the universe in a superstring model | 1 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Kei‐ichi Maeda
Kei‐ichi Maeda is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (45 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (34 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.6k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (267 citations). Kei‐ichi Maeda has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Yasunori Fujii, Y Kitada, K. Satô, Hideo Kodama, Nobuyoshi Ohta, Misao Sasaki, M. Sasaki, H. Sato, D. H. Coule and Jun’ichi Yokoyama. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Physics Letters B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.