Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
General relativistic boson stars
2003509 citationsFranz E. Schunck, Eckehard W. Mielkeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Franz E. Schunck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Franz E. Schunck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Franz E. Schunck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Franz E. Schunck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Franz E. Schunck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Franz E. Schunck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Franz E. Schunck. The network helps show where Franz E. Schunck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Franz E. Schunck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Franz E. Schunck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Franz E. Schunck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Franz E. Schunck. Franz E. Schunck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Obregón, Octavio, L. Arturo Ureña–López, & Franz E. Schunck. (2005). Oscillatons formed by nonlinear gravity. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 72(2).8 indexed citations
Mielke, Eckehard W. & Franz E. Schunck. (2002). Nontopological scalar soliton as dark matter halo. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 66(2).50 indexed citations
Da̧browski, Mariusz P. & Franz E. Schunck. (2000). Boson Stars as Gravitational Lenses. The Astrophysical Journal. 535(1). 316–324.51 indexed citations
Torres, D. F., Andrew R. Liddle, & Franz E. Schunck. (1998). Gravitational memory of boson stars. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 57(8). 4821–4825.32 indexed citations
14.
Liddle, Andrew R., Anupam Mazumdar, & Franz E. Schunck. (1998). Assisted inflation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 58(6).281 indexed citations
Obukhov, Yuri N. & Franz E. Schunck. (1997). Regular solutions in the Abelian gauge model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 55(4). 2307–2319.5 indexed citations
Schunck, Franz E. & Eckehard W. Mielke. (1994). Method of generating exact inflationary solutions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 50(8). 4794–4806.31 indexed citations
20.
Mielke, Eckehard W., et al.. (1991). Gravitational stability of boson stars. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 43(12). 3895–3901.103 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.