Katie M White
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Clinical Psychology
- Education
- Co-authors
- Faith MatchamMatthew HotopfAnthony BaileySimon WallaceSarah ParsonsValeria de AngelCarolin OetzmannDaniel Leightley
- Topics
- Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers)Digital Mental Health Interventions (12 papers)Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Katie M White
21 papers receiving 325 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
- Applied Psychology 121
- Cognitive Neuroscience 93
- Clinical Psychology 47
- Education 44
Countries citing papers authored by Katie M White
This map shows the geographic impact of Katie M White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katie M White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katie M White more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katie M White
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katie M White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katie M White. The network helps show where Katie M White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katie M White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katie M White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katie M White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katie M White. Katie M White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methodsbreakdown → | 104 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 89 | |
| 19 | Pharmacotherapy observed in a large prospective longitudinal study on anxiety disorders. | 5 |
| 20 | Effects of endogenicity and severity on consistency of standard depression rating scales. | 12 |
About Katie M White
Katie M White is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (12 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (121 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (124 citations) and Occupational Therapy (26 citations). Katie M White has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Faith Matcham, Matthew Hotopf, Anthony Bailey, Simon Wallace, Sarah Parsons, Valeria de Angel, Carolin Oetzmann, Daniel Leightley, David C. Mohr and Grace Lavelle. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.