Kathy Gedling
About
In The Last Decade
Kathy Gedling
9 papers receiving 868 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Psychiatry and Mental health 570
- General Health Professions 241
- Cognitive Neuroscience 164
- Clinical Psychology 117
- Demography 113
Countries citing papers authored by Kathy Gedling
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathy Gedling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathy Gedling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathy Gedling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathy Gedling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathy Gedling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathy Gedling. The network helps show where Kathy Gedling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathy Gedling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathy Gedling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathy Gedling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathy Gedling. Kathy Gedling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62 | |
| 2 | 73 | |
| 3 | 55 | |
| 4 | 224 | |
| 5 | 130 | |
| 6 | 73 | |
| 7 | 195 | |
| 8 | 59 | |
| 9 | 64 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.