Kathryn E. Freemark

3.4k total citations
32 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Kathryn E. Freemark is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathryn E. Freemark has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Ecology, 17 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Kathryn E. Freemark's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (11 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (10 papers). Kathryn E. Freemark is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (11 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (10 papers). Kathryn E. Freemark collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Kathryn E. Freemark's co-authors include Céline Boutin, H. Gray Merriam, James R. Karr, Louis B. Best, David Anthony Kirk, Denis White, Cathy J. Keddy, Timothy M. Bergin, Pamela A. Martin and Hans G. Peterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Ecology Letters and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Kathryn E. Freemark

32 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathryn E. Freemark Canada 22 1.4k 1.2k 715 455 398 32 2.6k
Philip Roche France 31 993 0.7× 773 0.7× 1.2k 1.7× 533 1.2× 325 0.8× 76 2.8k
Jeremy Biggs United Kingdom 31 3.3k 2.4× 1.5k 1.3× 830 1.2× 373 0.8× 599 1.5× 59 4.8k
Karen M. Carney United States 11 1.3k 1.0× 474 0.4× 788 1.1× 461 1.0× 145 0.4× 13 2.8k
Shigeo Yachi Japan 8 1.0k 0.7× 1.2k 1.0× 778 1.1× 737 1.6× 216 0.5× 11 2.7k
Anita Díaz United Kingdom 22 799 0.6× 966 0.8× 837 1.2× 742 1.6× 203 0.5× 73 2.6k
Joana R. Vicente Portugal 28 819 0.6× 735 0.6× 567 0.8× 348 0.8× 715 1.8× 72 2.2k
David A. Haukos United States 30 2.1k 1.6× 749 0.6× 701 1.0× 233 0.5× 377 0.9× 159 2.8k
J.M. Baveco Netherlands 26 640 0.5× 527 0.5× 549 0.8× 300 0.7× 261 0.7× 61 2.0k
Irina Herzon Finland 21 1.0k 0.8× 987 0.9× 1.0k 1.4× 634 1.4× 345 0.9× 63 3.0k
Andrea B. Pfisterer Switzerland 8 877 0.6× 1.4k 1.2× 1.0k 1.5× 691 1.5× 244 0.6× 8 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn E. Freemark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn E. Freemark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn E. Freemark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn E. Freemark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn E. Freemark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn E. Freemark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn E. Freemark. The network helps show where Kathryn E. Freemark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn E. Freemark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn E. Freemark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn E. Freemark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn E. Freemark. Kathryn E. Freemark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Freemark, Kathryn E., et al.. (2005). Matrix Matters: Effects of Surrounding Land Uses on Forest Birds Near Ottawa, Canada. Landscape Ecology. 20(5). 497–511. 85 indexed citations
2.
Santelmann, Mary V., Kathryn E. Freemark, Jean C. Sifneos, & Denis White. (2005). Assessing effects of alternative agricultural practices on wildlife habitat in Iowa, USA. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 113(1-4). 243–253. 21 indexed citations
3.
Burke, Dawn M., et al.. (2004). Patterns of Nest Predation on Artificial and Natural Nests in Forests. Conservation Biology. 18(2). 381–388. 107 indexed citations
4.
Forsyth, David M., A. R. E. Sinclair, Kathryn E. Freemark, et al.. (2004). Species distributions, surrogacy, and important conservation regions in Canada. Ecology Letters. 7(5). 374–379. 88 indexed citations
5.
Lee, Michelle, Lenore Fahrig, Kathryn E. Freemark, & David J. Currie. (2002). Importance of patch scale vs landscape scale on selected forest birds. Oikos. 96(1). 110–118. 95 indexed citations
6.
Kirk, David Anthony, Céline Boutin, & Kathryn E. Freemark. (2001). A multivariate analysis of bird species composition and abundance between crop types and seasons in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecoscience. 8(2). 173–184. 11 indexed citations
7.
Best, Louis B., Timothy M. Bergin, & Kathryn E. Freemark. (2001). Influence of Landscape Composition on Bird Use of Rowcrop Fields. Journal of Wildlife Management. 65(3). 442–442. 51 indexed citations
8.
Bergin, Timothy M., Louis B. Best, Kathryn E. Freemark, & Kenneth J. Koehler. (2000). . Landscape Ecology. 15(2). 131–143. 92 indexed citations
9.
Hulse, David, et al.. (2000). Planning Alternative Future Landscapes in Oregon: Evaluating Effects on Water Quality and Biodiversity. Landscape Journal. 19(1-2). 1–19. 32 indexed citations
11.
White, Denis, Priscilla Minotti, Jean C. Sifneos, et al.. (1997). Assessing Risks to Biodiversity from Future Landscape Change. Conservation Biology. 11(2). 349–360. 140 indexed citations
12.
Best, Louis B., Kathryn E. Freemark, Barbara Steiner, & Timothy M. Bergin. (1996). Life History and Status Classifications of Birds Breeding in Iowa. UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa). 103. 34–45. 14 indexed citations
13.
Freemark, Kathryn E., et al.. (1995). The Use of Plants for Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 30(3). 289–301. 152 indexed citations
14.
Boutin, Céline, Kathryn E. Freemark, & Cathy J. Keddy. (1995). OVERVIEW AND RATIONALE FOR DEVELOPING REGULATORY GUIDELINES FOR NONTARGET PLANT TESTING WITH CHEMICAL PESTICIDES. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 14(9). 1465–1465. 2 indexed citations
15.
Cyr, André, Denis Lepage, & Kathryn E. Freemark. (1995). Evaluating point count efficiency relative to territory mapping in cropland birds. 149. 63–68. 10 indexed citations
16.
Boutin, Céline, Kathryn E. Freemark, & Cathy J. Keddy. (1995). Overview and rationale for developing regulatory guidelines for nontarget plant testing with chemical pesticides. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 14(9). 1465–1475. 50 indexed citations
17.
Freemark, Kathryn E. & Céline Boutin. (1995). Impacts of agricultural herbicide use on terrestrial wildlife in temperate landscapes: A review with special reference to North America. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 52(2-3). 67–91. 189 indexed citations
18.
Best, Louis B., et al.. (1995). A Review and Synthesis of Habitat Use by Breeding Birds in Agricultural Landscapes of Iowa. The American Midland Naturalist. 134(1). 1–1. 139 indexed citations
19.
Peterson, Hans G., et al.. (1994). Aquatic phyto-toxicity of 23 pesticides applied at expected environmental concentrations. Aquatic Toxicology. 28(3-4). 275–292. 243 indexed citations
20.
Karr, James R. & Kathryn E. Freemark. (1983). Habitat Selection and Environmental Gradients: Dynamics in the "Stable" Tropics. Ecology. 64(6). 1481–1494. 209 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026