Kathryn D. Wine

574 total citations
8 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

Kathryn D. Wine is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathryn D. Wine has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 4 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Kathryn D. Wine's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). Kathryn D. Wine is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). Kathryn D. Wine collaborates with scholars based in United States. Kathryn D. Wine's co-authors include Daniel Cher, Harry Lockstadt, Jonathan N. Sembrano, John A. Glaser, Clay Frank, Robert Limoni, David W. Polly, Peter G. Whang, Bradley Duhon and Dena Goffman and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Neurosurgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Kathryn D. Wine

8 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kathryn D. Wine United States	6	326	288	209	109	57	8	410
Jordan A. Guntin United States	11	239 0.7×	253 0.9×	104 0.5×	37 0.3×	3 0.1×	26	331
Kaitlyn L. Cardinal United States	11	229 0.7×	243 0.8×	101 0.5×	35 0.3×	3 0.1×	24	319
Colin Moore United Kingdom	5	31 0.1×	168 0.6×	24 0.1×	18 0.2×	24 0.4×	6	223
Steven T. Fogel United States	7	77 0.2×	293 1.0×	15 0.1×	31 0.3×	52 0.9×	13	320
Ken Thomas Canada	11	250 0.8×	286 1.0×	67 0.3×	25 0.2×	2 0.0×	25	339
Jason Seale United States	10	305 0.9×	343 1.2×	48 0.2×	28 0.3×	2 0.0×	31	393
Timothy Oswald United States	9	60 0.2×	347 1.2×	37 0.2×	20 0.2×	58 1.0×	14	377
Ömür Erçelen Türkiye	10	158 0.5×	199 0.7×	87 0.4×	18 0.2×	5 0.1×	29	295
Daniel Leas United States	9	59 0.2×	178 0.6×	42 0.2×	70 0.6×	6 0.1×	24	228
George A. Beyer United States	10	88 0.3×	206 0.7×	26 0.1×	16 0.1×	7 0.1×	26	264

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn D. Wine

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn D. Wine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn D. Wine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn D. Wine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn D. Wine

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn D. Wine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn D. Wine. The network helps show where Kathryn D. Wine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn D. Wine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn D. Wine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn D. Wine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn D. Wine. Kathryn D. Wine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Goffman, Dena, Kara M. Rood, Angela Bianco, et al.. (2023). Real-World Utilization of an Intrauterine, Vacuum-Induced, Hemorrhage-Control Device. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 142(5). 1006–1016. 13 indexed citations

Goffman, Dena, Kara M. Rood, Angela Bianco, et al.. (2023). Real-world utilization of an intrauterine vacuum-induced hemorrhage-control device. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 228(1). S767–S767. 2 indexed citations

D’Alton, Mary E., Kara M. Rood, Marcela C. Smid, et al.. (2020). Intrauterine Vacuum-Induced Hemorrhage-Control Device for Rapid Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 136(5). 882–891. 44 indexed citations

Polly, David W., Daniel Cher, Kathryn D. Wine, et al.. (2016). Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. NonSurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Global Spine Journal. 6(1_suppl). s–36. 2 indexed citations

Polly, David W., Peter G. Whang, Clay Frank, et al.. (2016). Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. The International Journal of Spine Surgery. 10. 28–28. 142 indexed citations

Polly, David W., Daniel Cher, Kathryn D. Wine, et al.. (2015). Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Neurosurgery. 77(5). 674–691. 100 indexed citations

Duhon, Bradley, et al.. (2015). Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study. Global Spine Journal. 6(3). 257–269. 47 indexed citations

Cher, Daniel, et al.. (2013). Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study. Medical Devices Evidence and Research. 6. 219–219. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact