Kathryn A. Stokes
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Molecular Biology
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Phillip J. BestDan McIntyreMorris FreedmanJudith W. HerrmanDaniel J. CoxNina EdsonSandra E. BlackMorris Moscovitch
- Topics
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kathryn A. Stokes
20 papers receiving 395 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Cognitive Neuroscience 280
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 234
- Psychiatry and Mental health 62
- Molecular Biology 45
- Behavioral Neuroscience 41
Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn A. Stokes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn A. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn A. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn A. Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn A. Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn A. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn A. Stokes. The network helps show where Kathryn A. Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn A. Stokes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn A. Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn A. Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn A. Stokes. Kathryn A. Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 56 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 69 | |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Kathryn A. Stokes
Kathryn A. Stokes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (280 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (234 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (41 citations). Kathryn A. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Phillip J. Best, Dan McIntyre, Morris Freedman, Judith W. Herrman, Daniel J. Cox, Nina Edson, Sandra E. Black, Morris Moscovitch, Robyn Westmacott and Angela K. Troyer. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Diabetologia and Experimental Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.