Kathleen Deas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Samar AounChristine ToyeKelli StajduharGail EwingDenise HowtingGunn GrandeSusan SlatyerCheryl Nekolaichuk
- Topics
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers)Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeneral Health Professions
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kathleen Deas
14 papers receiving 472 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 330
- General Health Professions 178
- Clinical Psychology 144
- Sociology and Political Science 124
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Deas
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Deas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Deas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Deas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Deas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Deas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Deas. The network helps show where Kathleen Deas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Deas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Deas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Deas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Deas. Kathleen Deas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | 40 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 93 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 21 |
About Kathleen Deas
Kathleen Deas is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 14 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (77 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (330 citations) and General Health Professions (178 citations). Kathleen Deas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Samar Aoun, Christine Toye, Kelli Stajduhar, Gail Ewing, Denise Howting, Gunn Grande, Susan Slatyer, Cheryl Nekolaichuk, Lakkhina Troeung and Moira O’Connor. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.