Katherine Jones-Smith

897 citations
14 papers · 261 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Katherine Jones-Smith

13 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Katherine Jones-Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 85
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 75
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 93
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 101
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 56
Replace Dionigi M. T. Benincasa with:
Dionigi M. T. Benincasa Italy
C. C. Dyer Canada
M. Sakagami Japan
Jonas Mureika United States
Amit Goswami United States
W. M. Stuckey United States
Javier F. Acevedo United States
Holger Lyre Germany
Amrit Šorli Italy
Katherine Jones-Smith relative to Dionigi M. T. Benincasa Italy Dionigi M. T. Benincasa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dionigi M. T. Benincasa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Jones-Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Jones-Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Jones-Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Jones-Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Jones-Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Jones-Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Jones-Smith. The network helps show where Katherine Jones-Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Katherine Jones-Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katherine Jones-Smith Line = papers co-authored together Katherine Jones-Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200662
2 200843
3 201042
4 201433
5 200917
6 201216
7 200716
8 201011
9 201010
10
NON-HERMITIAN QUANTUM MECHANICS
20106
11 20133
12
Is Inflation Observable
20091
13 20131
14 20120

About Katherine Jones-Smith

Katherine Jones-Smith is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Oceanography, having authored 14 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (3 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (2 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (2 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2 papers) and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (85 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (75 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (93 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (101 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (56 citations). Katherine Jones-Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Harsh Mathur, Lawrence M. Krauss, Francesc Ferrer, Dragan Huterer, Tanmay Vachaspati, James B. Dent and Joshua Isaacson. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A, New Journal of Physics, Nature and International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact