Katherine Coleman
About
In The Last Decade
Katherine Coleman
5 papers receiving 321 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Molecular Biology 249
- Cancer Research 85
- Physiology 76
- Organic Chemistry 42
- Oncology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Coleman
This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Coleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Coleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Coleman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Coleman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Coleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Coleman. The network helps show where Katherine Coleman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine Coleman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine Coleman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine Coleman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine Coleman. Katherine Coleman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 Week Group Counselling Proposal for Increasing Self-Esteem in Adolescent Females. | 1 |
| 2 | 237 | |
| 3 | 62 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 7 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.