Katharina Schmack
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Philipp SterzerAndreas HeinzFlorian SchlagenhaufJana WraseMarcus RothkirchAlbert R. PowersBen Alderson‐DayPhilip R. Corlett
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Katharina Schmack
36 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 614
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 459
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 423
- Clinical Psychology 296
Countries citing papers authored by Katharina Schmack
This map shows the geographic impact of Katharina Schmack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katharina Schmack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katharina Schmack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katharina Schmack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katharina Schmack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katharina Schmack. The network helps show where Katharina Schmack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katharina Schmack
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katharina Schmack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katharina Schmack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katharina Schmack. Katharina Schmack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 144 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | Hallucinations and Strong Priorsbreakdown → | 326 |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 59 | |
| 8 | 69 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 143 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 200 | |
| 18 | 151 | |
| 19 | 324 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About Katharina Schmack
Katharina Schmack is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Philosophy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (614 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (459 citations). Katharina Schmack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Philipp Sterzer, Andreas Heinz, Florian Schlagenhauf, Jana Wrase, Marcus Rothkirch, Albert R. Powers, Ben Alderson‐Day, Philip R. Corlett, Paul C. Fletcher and Guillermo Horga. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.