Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
DIFFERENTIATED INTEGRATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: MANY CONCEPTS, SPARSE THEORY, FEW DATA
2012155 citationsKatharina Holzinger et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Katharina Holzinger
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Katharina Holzinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katharina Holzinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katharina Holzinger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katharina Holzinger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katharina Holzinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katharina Holzinger. The network helps show where Katharina Holzinger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katharina Holzinger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katharina Holzinger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katharina Holzinger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Katharina Holzinger. Katharina Holzinger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Holzinger, Katharina. (2008). Treaty Formation and Strategic Constellations : a comment on "Treaties: Strategic considerations". University of Illinois law review. 187–200.1 indexed citations
Holzinger, Katharina. (2007). career incentives. European Political Science. 6(2). 177–184.3 indexed citations
9.
Holzinger, Katharina & Christoph Knill. (2005). Competition, Cooperation and Communication : A Theoretical Analysis of Different Sources of Environmental Policy Convergence and Their Interaction. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 102. 40.3 indexed citations
Bizer, Kilian, Martin Führ, Roland Czada, et al.. (2002). Responsive Regulierung: Beiträge zur interdisziplinären Institutionenanalyse und Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
14.
Holzinger, Katharina & Christoph Knill. (2001). Institutionelle Entwicklungspfade im europäischen Integrationsprozess : Eine konstruktive Kritik an Joschka Fischers Vorschlägen. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. 11(3). 987–1010.2 indexed citations
Holzinger, Katharina. (2000). Environmental Policy in a European Union of variable geometry? : the challenge of the next enlargement. IRIS.24 indexed citations
18.
Holzinger, Katharina. (2000). Optimale Regulierungseinheiten : ein Konzept für die regionale Differenzierung von Umweltstandards in der Europäischen Union. Max Planck Digital Library. 23. 547–582.3 indexed citations
19.
Holzinger, Katharina. (1998). Die Leistungsfähigkeit umweltpolitischer Kooperationslösungen. Econstor (Econstor). 39–73.
20.
Holzinger, Katharina. (1995). A surprising success in EC environmental policy : The small car exhaust emission directive of 1989. Econstor (Econstor). 187–202.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.