Kate Miltner

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
24 papers, 785 citations indexed

About

Kate Miltner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Miltner has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 785 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Communication and 6 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Kate Miltner's work include Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers) and Digital Games and Media (4 papers). Kate Miltner is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers) and Digital Games and Media (4 papers). Kate Miltner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Kate Miltner's co-authors include Sarah Banet‐Weiser, Tim Highfield, Kate Crawford, Mary L. Gray, Nancy K. Baym, Jeffrey A. Hall, Tamara Shepherd, Tim Jordan, Alison Harvey and Brooke Duffy and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, New Media & Society and Science Technology & Human Values.

In The Last Decade

Kate Miltner

20 papers receiving 732 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

#MasculinitySoFragile: culture, structure, and networked misogyny

2015 271 citations Kate Miltner et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kate Miltner United Kingdom	10	332	313	247	126	108	24	785
Tim Highfield Australia	13	591 1.8×	242 0.8×	646 2.6×	102 0.8×	113 1.0×	32	1.3k
Lisa Nakamura United States	11	533 1.6×	249 0.8×	243 1.0×	67 0.5×	86 0.8×	24	912
André Brock United States	13	471 1.4×	312 1.0×	467 1.9×	49 0.4×	109 1.0×	18	977
James Meese Australia	12	391 1.2×	151 0.5×	302 1.2×	94 0.7×	61 0.6×	46	823
Adrienne Massanari United States	11	555 1.7×	423 1.4×	489 2.0×	88 0.7×	304 2.8×	16	1.1k
Michael E. Huge United States	11	421 1.3×	226 0.7×	340 1.4×	95 0.8×	56 0.5×	17	918
Melissa A. Click United States	8	505 1.5×	253 0.8×	375 1.5×	64 0.5×	33 0.3×	21	1.0k
T. L. Taylor Denmark	11	996 3.0×	239 0.8×	160 0.6×	55 0.4×	97 0.9×	18	1.2k
Lori Kendall United States	9	346 1.0×	197 0.6×	223 0.9×	49 0.4×	32 0.3×	15	631
Whitney Phillips United States	9	539 1.6×	250 0.8×	471 1.9×	156 1.2×	283 2.6×	14	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Miltner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Miltner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Miltner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Miltner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Miltner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Miltner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Miltner. The network helps show where Kate Miltner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Miltner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Miltner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Miltner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Miltner. Kate Miltner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Miltner, Kate. (2024). “A.I. is holding a mirror to our society”. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(4). 13–33. 2 indexed citations

2.

Miltner, Kate & Tim Highfield. (2024). The Possibilities of 'Good' Generative AI in the Cultural and Creative Industries. 1 indexed citations

3.

Highfield, Tim & Kate Miltner. (2023). Platformed solidarity: Examining the performative politics of Twitter hashflags. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 29(6). 1641–1667. 9 indexed citations

4.

Miltner, Kate, et al.. (2023). "I WORKED SO HARD, AND I STILL DIDN'T SUCCEED”: CODING BOOTCAMP EXPERIENCES OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research.

5.

Miltner, Kate, et al.. (2022). How to Conduct Internet Meme Research.

6.

Miltner, Kate. (2022). Everything Old Is New Again: A Comparison of Midcentury American EDP Schools and Contemporary Coding Bootcamps. Information & Culture. 57(3). 255–282. 4 indexed citations

7.

Bishop, Sophie & Kate Miltner. (2022). How to Research Online Influencers. 1 indexed citations

8.

Duffy, Brooke, et al.. (2022). Policing “Fake” Femininity: Authenticity, Accountability, and Influencer Antifandom. New Media & Society. 24(7). 1657–1676. 26 indexed citations

9.

Dunbar-Hester, Christina, et al.. (2021). “Chinese Elm 1030595 . . . (or can I call you Dale??)”: Communication and representation in mediated encounters with nonhuman others. New Media & Society. 24(10). 2291–2310. 1 indexed citations

10.

Miltner, Kate & Ysabel Gerrard. (2021). “Tom had us all doing front-end web development”: a nostalgic (re)imagining of Myspace. Edinburgh Research Explorer. 6(1-2). 48–67. 8 indexed citations

11.

Duffy, Brooke, et al.. (2020). POLICING "FAKE" FEMININITY: ANGER AND ACCUSATION IN INFLUENCER"HATEBLOG" COMMUNITIES. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research.

12.

Miltner, Kate. (2020). “One part politics, one part technology, one part history”: Racial representation in the Unicode 7.0 emoji set. New Media & Society. 23(3). 515–534. 14 indexed citations

13.

Miltner, Kate. (2018). RuPaul’s Drag Race Keyboard: Affect and Resistance through Visual Communication. 289–298. 1 indexed citations

14.

Miltner, Kate. (2018). Girls Who Coded: Gender in Twentieth Century U.K. and U.S. Computing. Science Technology & Human Values. 44(1). 161–176. 6 indexed citations

15.

Miltner, Kate & Nancy K. Baym. (2015). The Selfie of the Year of the Selfie: Reflections on a Media Scandal. International journal of communication. 11 indexed citations

16.

Shepherd, Tamara, et al.. (2015). Histories of Hating. Social Media + Society. 1(2). 49 indexed citations

17.

Crawford, Kate, Mary L. Gray, & Kate Miltner. (2014). Big Data| Critiquing Big Data: Politics, Ethics, Epistemology | Special Section Introduction. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8. 10. 46 indexed citations

18.

Hall, Jeffrey A., Nancy K. Baym, & Kate Miltner. (2014). Put down that phone and talk to me: Understanding the roles of mobile phone norm adherence and similarity in relationships. Mobile Media & Communication. 2(2). 134–153. 49 indexed citations

19.

Crawford, Kate, Kate Miltner, & Mary L. Gray. (2014). Critiquing Big Data: Politics, Ethics, Epistemology. 8. 1663–1672. 75 indexed citations

20.

Miltner, Kate. (2014). “There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats”: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme. First Monday. 132 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact