Kate Law

21 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers

Kate Law
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • Emergency Medical Services 28
  • Oncology 71
  • General Health Professions 65
Replace Carol McPherson with:
Carol McPherson United States
Rachel Hirschey United States
Lang Tian China
Sonali Johnson United States
Edvane Birelo Lopes De Domenico Brazil
Bonnie Jerome-D’Emilia United States
Kelly Brassil United States
Linda Reaby Australia
Lea Godino Italy
Christine Way Canada
Kate Law relative to Carol McPherson United States Carol McPherson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Carol McPherson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Law more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Law. The network helps show where Kate Law may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Law, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Law Line = papers co-authored together Kate Law links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199065
2 201337
3 200626
4 200617
5 200912
6 201112
7 201111
8 200211
9
Troponin testing for chest pain in primary healthcare: a survey of its use by general practitioners in New Zealand.
20067
10 20127
11 20166
12
Troponin testing for chest pain in primary healthcare: a New Zealand audit.
20065
13 20194
14 20183
15 20183
16 20113
17 20212
18 20122
19 20102
20 20031

About Kate Law

Kate Law is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers) and Nursing education and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (9 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations), Emergency Medical Services (28 citations), Oncology (71 citations) and General Health Professions (65 citations). Kate Law has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Kay Aranda, Duncan M. Geddes, Jeffrey Tobias, Elizabeth G. Hill, Robert L. Souhami, Peter Harper, Stephen Spiro, Anastassia Negrouk, W. Garry John and Michel Seymour. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice, The Lancet Oncology, Cancer Nursing and European Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact