Kate Johnstone
Impact in
- Microbiology top 10%
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment 1
- Oncology 2
- Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 2
- Co-authors
- Jennifer Robson (1 shared paper)Amy E. McCart Reed (1 shared paper)Rayleen Bowman (1 shared paper)Anna Sokolova (1 shared paper)Anne B. Chang (1 shared paper)Kwun M. Fong (1 shared paper)Peter T. Simpson (1 shared paper)Ian A. Yang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Dermatology (1 paper)Journal of Cutaneous Pathology (1 paper)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 paper)Transplant Immunology (1 paper)ANZ Journal of Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNetherlandsDenmark
In The Last Decade
Kate Johnstone
7 papers receiving 144 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Microbiology 8
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 52
- Dermatology 21
- Endocrinology 8
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 43
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Johnstone
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Johnstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Johnstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Johnstone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Johnstone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Johnstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Johnstone. The network helps show where Kate Johnstone may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Johnstone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 9 | Reframing adolescence: implications for theory, policy and practice | 2007 | 0 |
About Kate Johnstone
Kate Johnstone is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Energy Efficiency and Management (1 paper), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (1 paper), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (1 paper), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (1 paper), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper) and Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (8 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (52 citations), Dermatology (21 citations), Endocrinology (8 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (43 citations). Kate Johnstone has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Robson, Amy E. McCart Reed, Rayleen Bowman, Anna Sokolova, Anne B. Chang, Kwun M. Fong, Peter T. Simpson, Ian A. Yang, Sunil R. Lakhani and Geoffrey Strutton. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Transplant Immunology and ANZ Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.