Kate Fenner
Impact in
- Equine top 0.5%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Papers in
- Equine 24
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research 24
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 10
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 3
- Co-authors
- Paul McGreevy (23 shared papers)Andrew N. McLean (9 shared papers)Peter White (3 shared papers)Melissa Starling (2 shared papers)Bethany Wilson (12 shared papers)Angela J. Crean (1 shared paper)Cristina Wilkins (6 shared papers)Katherine Dashper (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Animals (13 papers)Journal of Veterinary Behavior (5 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)Anthrozoös (1 paper)Veterinary Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kate Fenner
22 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Equine 259
- Small Animals 163
- Speech and Hearing 66
- Animal Science and Zoology 62
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 46
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Fenner
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Fenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Fenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Fenner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Fenner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Fenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Fenner. The network helps show where Kate Fenner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Fenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 3 |
About Kate Fenner
Kate Fenner is a scholar working on Equine, Small Animals, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Speech and Hearing and Genetics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (24 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (6 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (6 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (4 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers), Sports Performance and Training (3 papers) and Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (259 citations), Small Animals (163 citations), Speech and Hearing (66 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (62 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (46 citations). Kate Fenner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul McGreevy, Andrew N. McLean, Peter White, Melissa Starling, Bethany Wilson, Angela J. Crean, Cristina Wilkins, Katherine Dashper, Catalina L. Toma and Fiona Probyn‐Rapsey. Their work appears in journals such as Animals, Journal of Veterinary Behavior, PLoS ONE, Anthrozoös and Veterinary Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.