Karita Kan
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 1%
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Hok Bun KuJuan ChenXi ChenDeborah DavisSamson YuenJie SunHanjie WuLinghui Meng
- Topics
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (19 papers)Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers)Rural development and sustainability (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Urban StudiesGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesPolitical Science and International Relations
- Partner nations
- Hong KongChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Karita Kan
27 papers receiving 458 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Political Science and International Relations 227
- Sociology and Political Science 178
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165
- Urban Studies 148
- Soil Science 85
Countries citing papers authored by Karita Kan
This map shows the geographic impact of Karita Kan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karita Kan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karita Kan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karita Kan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karita Kan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karita Kan. The network helps show where Karita Kan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karita Kan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karita Kan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karita Kan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karita Kan. Karita Kan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | Lessons in patriotism | 1 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Karita Kan
Karita Kan is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Urban Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 29 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (19 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (148 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (165 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (227 citations). Karita Kan has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hok Bun Ku, Juan Chen, Xi Chen, Deborah Davis, Samson Yuen, Jie Sun, Hanjie Wu, Linghui Meng, Rufu Jia and Xian Li. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Studies, Journal of Rural Studies and Cities.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.