Karen Sadler-Fredd
About
In The Last Decade
Karen Sadler-Fredd
4 papers receiving 31 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 9
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 26
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 25
- Reproductive Medicine 22
- Molecular Biology 4
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 1
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Sadler-Fredd
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Sadler-Fredd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Sadler-Fredd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Sadler-Fredd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Sadler-Fredd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Sadler-Fredd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Sadler-Fredd. The network helps show where Karen Sadler-Fredd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Sadler-Fredd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Sadler-Fredd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Sadler-Fredd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Sadler-Fredd. Karen Sadler-Fredd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 22 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.