Karen E. Shackleford
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kristin D. NeffMicah O. MazurekErica ScharrerDonald S. GrantMelanie C. GreenAnne BartschSrividya RamasubramanianElizabeth Behm‐Morawitz
- Topics
- Media Influence and Health (9 papers)Media, Gender, and Advertising (7 papers)Media Studies and Communication (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Karen E. Shackleford
16 papers receiving 490 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Clinical Psychology 344
- Social Psychology 120
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
- Literature and Literary Theory 59
Countries citing papers authored by Karen E. Shackleford
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen E. Shackleford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen E. Shackleford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen E. Shackleford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen E. Shackleford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen E. Shackleford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen E. Shackleford. The network helps show where Karen E. Shackleford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen E. Shackleford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen E. Shackleford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen E. Shackleford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen E. Shackleford. Karen E. Shackleford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | Finding Truth in Fiction: What Fan Culture Gets Right--and Why it's Good to Get Lost in a Story | 0 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | How Fantasy Becomes Reality: Information and Entertainment Media in Everyday Life, Revised and Expanded | 1 |
| 15 | Mad Men Unzipped: Fans on Sex, Love, and the Sixties on TV | 1 |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | Self-Compassion and Body Dissatisfaction in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Meditation Interventionbreakdown → | 356 |
About Karen E. Shackleford
Karen E. Shackleford is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication, having authored 18 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (9 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (7 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (344 citations), Applied Psychology (58 citations) and Pharmacy (45 citations). Karen E. Shackleford has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kristin D. Neff, Micah O. Mazurek, Erica Scharrer, Donald S. Grant, Melanie C. Green, Anne Bartsch, Srividya Ramasubramanian, Elizabeth Behm‐Morawitz, Melinda C. R. Burgess and Dafna Lemish. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Frontiers in Psychology and Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.