Karen D. Fern

708 total citations
27 papers, 528 citations indexed

About

Karen D. Fern is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Karen D. Fern has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 528 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Epidemiology, 14 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 11 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Karen D. Fern's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers). Karen D. Fern is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers). Karen D. Fern collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Karen D. Fern's co-authors include Ruth E. Manny, Leslie Hyman, Jane Gwiazda, Mitchell Scheiman, Li Deng, Heather A. Anderson, Qinghua Zhang, Katherine K. Weise, Janis M. White and James R. Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as Vision Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Optometry and Vision Science.

In The Last Decade

Karen D. Fern

25 papers receiving 509 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Karen D. Fern United States	16	399	276	272	155	33	27	528
Neryla Jolly Australia	8	332 0.8×	225 0.8×	113 0.4×	198 1.3×	20 0.6×	12	479
Christie L. Morse United States	9	372 0.9×	316 1.1×	186 0.7×	193 1.2×	67 2.0×	13	519
Katherine K. Weise United States	14	370 0.9×	232 0.8×	164 0.6×	136 0.9×	21 0.6×	32	480
Elise Harb United States	11	418 1.0×	325 1.2×	383 1.4×	108 0.7×	12 0.4×	21	594
D L Ehrlich United Kingdom	5	386 1.0×	249 0.9×	263 1.0×	112 0.7×	49 1.5×	9	477
Ian E. Pacey United Kingdom	13	320 0.8×	377 1.4×	283 1.0×	259 1.7×	25 0.8×	20	626
ROBERT P. RUTSTEIN United States	15	468 1.2×	362 1.3×	181 0.7×	304 2.0×	169 5.1×	58	722
David B. Elliot Canada	4	282 0.7×	218 0.8×	170 0.6×	151 1.0×	9 0.3×	5	502
Bill B. Rainey United States	9	211 0.5×	132 0.5×	113 0.4×	130 0.8×	75 2.3×	16	405
Lisa O’Donoghue United Kingdom	13	605 1.5×	457 1.7×	501 1.8×	67 0.4×	12 0.4×	18	729

Countries citing papers authored by Karen D. Fern

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen D. Fern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen D. Fern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen D. Fern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen D. Fern

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen D. Fern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen D. Fern. The network helps show where Karen D. Fern may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen D. Fern

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen D. Fern. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen D. Fern based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen D. Fern. Karen D. Fern is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Anderson, Heather A., et al.. (2020). A Randomized Trial of Objective Spectacle Prescriptions for Adults with Down Syndrome: Baseline Data and Methods. Optometry and Vision Science. 98(1). 88–99. 4 indexed citations

Manny, Ruth E., Li Deng, Jane Gwiazda, et al.. (2016). Internal Astigmatism in Myopes and Non‐myopes: Compensation or Constant?. Optometry and Vision Science. 93(9). 1079–1092. 7 indexed citations

Manny, Ruth E., et al.. (2013). Myopia, contact lens use and self‐esteem. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 33(5). 573–580. 24 indexed citations

Fern, Karen D., Ruth E. Manny, Jane Gwiazda, et al.. (2012). Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness in the COMET Cohort. Optometry and Vision Science. 89(8). 1225–1234. 18 indexed citations

Anderson, Heather A., Karla K. Stuebing, Karen D. Fern, & Ruth E. Manny. (2011). Ten-Year Changes in Fusional Vergence, Phoria, and Nearpoint of Convergence in Myopic Children. Optometry and Vision Science. 88(9). 1060–1065. 23 indexed citations

Manny, Ruth E., Liming Dong, Jane E. Gwiazda, et al.. (2010). Intraocular Pressure (IOP) and Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) in the Collaborative Observational Study of Myopia in the COMET Cohort (COSMICC). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 2196–2196.

Anderson, Heather A., et al.. (2010). Comparison of Two Drug Combinations for Dilating Dark Irides. Optometry and Vision Science. 87(2). 120–124. 11 indexed citations

Marsh‐Tootle, Wendy, Li Dong, Leslie Hyman, et al.. (2009). Myopia Progression in Children Wearing Spectacles vs. Switching to Contact Lenses. Optometry and Vision Science. 86(6). 741–747. 19 indexed citations

Manny, Ruth E., et al.. (2002). The Relationship between Self-Esteem of Myopic Children and Ocular and Demographic Characteristics. Optometry and Vision Science. 79(11). 688–696. 27 indexed citations

10.

Fern, Karen D., et al.. (1997). Sterility of Ophthalmic Drugs Dispensed from Spray Bottles. Optometry and Vision Science. 74(10). 865–867. 4 indexed citations

11.

Smith, Earl, Karen D. Fern, Ruth E. Manny, & Ronald S. Harwerth. (1994). Interocular Suppression Produced by Rivalry Stimuli: A Comparison of Normal and Abnormal Binocular Vision. Optometry and Vision Science. 71(8). 479–491. 6 indexed citations

12.

Manny, Ruth E., et al.. (1993). 1% Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride: Another Look at the Time Course of Cycloplegia Using an Objective Measure of the Accommodative Response. Optometry and Vision Science. 70(8). 651–665. 49 indexed citations

13.

Manny, Ruth E., et al.. (1991). Accommodative response following percent cyclopentolate hydrochloride as a function of dosage and iris color. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 32(4). 1124. 3 indexed citations

14.

Manny, Ruth E., et al.. (1991). Testing Stereopsis in the Preschool Child: Is It Clinically Useful?. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 28(4). 223–231. 25 indexed citations

15.

Manny, Ruth E. & Karen D. Fern. (1990). Motion coherence in infants. Vision Research. 30(9). 1319–1329. 21 indexed citations

16.

Fern, Karen D.. (1989). Visual Acuity Outcome in Isometropic Hyperopia. Optometry and Vision Science. 66(10). 649–658. 18 indexed citations

17.

Manny, Ruth E., Karen D. Fern, & David Loshin. (1987). Contour Interaction Function in the Preschool Child. Optometry and Vision Science. 64(9). 686–692. 18 indexed citations

18.

Fern, Karen D., et al.. (1986). Contour Interaction in the Preschool Child. Optometry and Vision Science. 63(5). 313–318. 26 indexed citations

19.

Fern, Karen D. & Ruth E. Manny. (1986). Visual Acuity of the Preschool Child. Optometry and Vision Science. 63(5). 319–345. 67 indexed citations

20.

Rosner, Jerome & Karen D. Fern. (1983). A new version of the TVAS: a validation report.. PubMed. 54(7). 603–6. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact