Kamlesh Chauhan
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 4
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 4
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 2
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics 2
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 2
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
-
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents 1
-
- Boron Compounds in Chemistry 1
- Co-authors
- Christopher G. FrostDavid W. WaiteRichard Vaughan WilliamsLloyd M. JackmanDick Van der HelmM. Bilayet HossainJoseph P. HartleyAshwani Vij
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)Synlett (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kamlesh Chauhan
9 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Organic Chemistry 461
- Process Chemistry and Technology 22
- Inorganic Chemistry 72
- Pharmaceutical Science 17
- Molecular Biology 146
Countries citing papers authored by Kamlesh Chauhan
This map shows the geographic impact of Kamlesh Chauhan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kamlesh Chauhan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kamlesh Chauhan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kamlesh Chauhan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kamlesh Chauhan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kamlesh Chauhan. The network helps show where Kamlesh Chauhan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Kamlesh Chauhan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 187 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 58 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 170 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 4 |
About Kamlesh Chauhan
Kamlesh Chauhan is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Toxicology, Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 10 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (2 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (2 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (1 paper) and Boron Compounds in Chemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (461 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (22 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (72 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (17 citations) and Molecular Biology (146 citations). Kamlesh Chauhan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher G. Frost, David W. Waite, Richard Vaughan Williams, Lloyd M. Jackman, Dick Van der Helm, M. Bilayet Hossain, Joseph P. Hartley, Ashwani Vij and Jennifer L. Palmer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Tetrahedron Letters, Synlett, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.